Skip to content

feat: add CopyExec and move CopyExec handling to Spark #2001

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dharanad
Copy link
Contributor

@dharanad dharanad commented Jul 8, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #1995

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@dharanad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mbutrovich I would appreciate it if you could take a look at this PR and provide some early feedback on whether I'm headed in the right direction

@mbutrovich
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, I think this is headed in the right direction. Really anywhere you see us having hard-coded rules about inserting CopyExec in planner.rs we'd like to have consolidated down to a more concise, modifiable function on the Scala side. This looks to be going that way.

@dharanad
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep, I think this is headed in the right direction. Really anywhere you see us having hard-coded rules about inserting CopyExec in planner.rs we'd like to have consolidated down to a more concise, modifiable function on the Scala side. This looks to be going that way.

Thanks for the feedback @mbutrovich

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create CopyExec node on Spark side, move related logic from native
2 participants