Skip to content

Format #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2025
Merged

Format #44

merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2025

Conversation

andreiavrammsd
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

review-ai-agent bot commented May 28, 2025

Pull Request Revisions

RevisionDescription
r2
Refactored code formatting and commentsUpdated rustfmt configuration and reformatted comments across multiple files to improve readability and consistency
r1
Improved code formatting and documentationUpdated rustfmt.toml settings, rewrapped comments, and improved documentation formatting across multiple files

✅ AI review completed for r2
Help React with emojis to give feedback on AI-generated reviews:
  • 👍 means the feedback was helpful and actionable
  • 👎 means the feedback was incorrect or unhelpful
💬 Replying to feedback with a comment helps us improve the system. Your input also contributes to shaping future interactions with the AI reviewer.

We'd love to hear from you—reach out anytime at team@review.ai.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (889a65d) to head (32c5230).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #44   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines          803       803           
=========================================
  Hits           803       803           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In src/lib.rs, the pop_if function implementation could potentially panic when called on an empty vector. Consider adding a bounds check similar to what's in the pop function to prevent undefined behavior when the vector is empty.

@andreiavrammsd andreiavrammsd merged commit b145b84 into master May 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@andreiavrammsd andreiavrammsd deleted the format branch May 28, 2025 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant