Non-strict order equational reasoning #1229
Open
+193
−96
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following #1203, this adds facilities for equational reasoning involving mixed use of <, ≤, ≡;
extracting a non-strict inequality instead of a strict one.
To extract a non-strict inequality, the additional data of
<-≤-weaken
is required (on top of what strict order already requires).The same notes as the previous PR apply, noting that now:
begin<
orbegin≤
is needed at the start of the chain, since it has to extract an inequality from the given chain.Changelog
The interface is now as follows:
<-≤-Reasoning
renamed to<-≤-StrictReasoning
begin_
renamed tobegin<_
<-≤-Reasoning
begin≤_
The
SubRelation
record has been deleted since it was out of place and not useful here, the instance has also been removed.Examples have been moved from a comment to a module, so that the compiler can check them for correctness in case of changes to the library.