Skip to content

Conversation

@gabriel-eidelman
Copy link
Collaborator

Why are these changes needed?

Fix UnboundLocalError

Note: will add tests

Checks

@joggrbot
Copy link

joggrbot bot commented Oct 28, 2025

📝 Documentation Analysis

All docs are up to date! 🎉


✅ Latest commit analyzed: 5805892 | Powered by Joggr

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Code Review

Thank you for fixing this UnboundLocalError! I've reviewed the changes and have the following feedback:

✅ Positive Aspects

  1. Correct Bug Fix: The fix properly addresses the UnboundLocalError that occurs when the for-loop completes without finding a matching agent.
  2. Good Use of for-else: Using Python's for-else construct is the idiomatic way to handle this scenario.
  3. Clear Error Message: The ValueError message clearly indicates what went wrong.

🐛 Issues Found

1. Typo in Error Message (autogen/agentchat/group/targets/function_target.py:70)

The error message contains a typo: "No agent found with in the group chat"

Should be: "No agent found within the group chat" or "No agent found in the group chat"

Suggested fix:

raise ValueError(f"No agent found in the group chat matching the target agent name {next_target}.")

2. Missing Test Coverage

As noted in the PR description, tests are still needed. The fix changes the behavior when an agent is not found from raising an UnboundLocalError to raising a ValueError with a descriptive message. This should be covered by:

  • A test case that verifies the ValueError is raised when construct_broadcast_messages_list is called with an AgentTarget or AgentNameTarget pointing to a non-existent agent
  • A test case that verifies the happy path (agent found) still works correctly

Example test structure:

def test_construct_broadcast_messages_list_agent_not_found():
    """Test that ValueError is raised when target agent is not in group chat."""
    # Setup: Create group chat without the target agent
    # Call: construct_broadcast_messages_list with non-existent agent
    # Assert: ValueError is raised with appropriate message

📋 Additional Recommendations

  1. Code Quality: The fix is clean and follows Python best practices.
  2. Performance: No performance concerns - the fix is minimal and efficient.
  3. Security: No security concerns identified.
  4. Documentation: The function docstring at line 61 could be enhanced to document the ValueError that can be raised, but this is a minor improvement.

✔️ Approval Status

Once the typo is fixed and tests are added, this PR will be ready to merge. The core logic is sound and addresses the bug correctly.


📝 Action Items

  • Fix typo in error message (line 70)
  • Add test coverage for the error case (agent not found)
  • Add test coverage for the success case (agent found)

Great work on identifying and fixing this issue! 🎉

@randombet randombet self-assigned this Oct 28, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@randombet randombet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@randombet randombet added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit b07a0f2 Oct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@randombet randombet deleted the fix/fn-target-unbound-local branch October 28, 2025 05:24
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
autogen/agentchat/group/targets/function_target.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
autogen/agentchat/group/targets/function_target.py 37.77% <0.00%> (-0.43%) ⬇️

... and 20 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants