Skip to content

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been...

Moderate severity Unreviewed Published Apr 14, 2025 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Apr 14, 2025

Package

No package listedSuggest a package

Affected versions

Unknown

Patched versions

Unknown

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel

When setting bootparams="trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" in the
cmdline, the output_printk() was called, and the spin_lock_irqsave() was called in the
atomic and irq disable interrupt context suitation. On the PREEMPT_RT kernel,
these locks are replaced with sleepable rt-spinlock, so the stack calltrace will
be triggered.
Fix it by raw_spin_lock_irqsave when PREEMPT_RT and "trace_event=initcall:initcall_start
tp_printk=1" enabled.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0
preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
Preemption disabled at:
[] try_to_wake_up+0x7e/0xba0
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt17+ #19 34c5812404187a875f32bee7977f7367f9679ea7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:

dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c
dump_stack+0x10/0x12
__might_resched.cold+0x11d/0x155
rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x70
trace_event_buffer_commit+0x2fa/0x4c0
? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93
trace_event_raw_event_initcall_start+0xbe/0x110
? perf_trace_initcall_finish+0x210/0x210
? probe_sched_wakeup+0x34/0x40
? ttwu_do_wakeup+0xda/0x310
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x35/0x170
? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93
do_one_initcall+0x217/0x3c0
? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level+0x170/0x170
? push_cpu_stop+0x400/0x400
? cblist_init_generic+0x241/0x290
kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x347
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x65/0x80
? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0
kernel_init+0x1e/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 26, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 14, 2025
Last updated Apr 14, 2025

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(3rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Locking

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2022-49322

GHSA ID

GHSA-9cc8-5cmc-hcj3

Source code

No known source code

Dependabot alerts are not supported on this advisory because it does not have a package from a supported ecosystem with an affected and fixed version.

Learn more about GitHub language support

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.