Skip to content

RabbitMQ.Client 7 and async #219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

patrikwlund
Copy link

Required a pretty intense rewrite for async support and the heavy API changes of RabbitMQ.Client 7.

I have used it for our applications' test suites, which are quite realistic and in-depth.

@patrikwlund
Copy link
Author

Ping @odalet ! Hoping you're willing to do some work on this repo! 😁

@odalet
Copy link

odalet commented Dec 22, 2024

Hi @patrikwlund! It seems you've been busy on this and it's probably a great addition to FakeRabbitMQ.

Sadly, because of unfortunate professional circumstances, I won't be able to keep on maintaining projects in this organization.

I could grant you a committer access on this porject, but I'm not sure it is a good idea: this organization (and most of the projects it hosts) is named after a real company. This was all good while I was maintaining things on their behalf, but this is not the case any more.

If you feel up to the task, you can establish your fork as the official successor of this project (renaming it, so as to get rid of the AddUp naming, or not, that's up to you).

If this is ok with you, I'll be happy to place a notice in the Readme file indicating your fork is now the place to go for an up-to-date FakeRabbitMQ library, just before I archive the repository. Just tell me so.

Sorry for leting you down.

@patrikwlund
Copy link
Author

Hi @patrikwlund! It seems you've been busy on this and it's probably a great addition to FakeRabbitMQ.

Sadly, because of unfortunate professional circumstances, I won't be able to keep on maintaining projects in this organization.

No worries @odalet, I understand 😊 Thank you for maintaining it previously.

I will probably fork it after the holidays. We'll see.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants