Skip to content

SCANJLIB-276 Allow to use a local Scanner Engine #253

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2025
Merged

SCANJLIB-276 Allow to use a local Scanner Engine #253

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2025

Conversation

henryju
Copy link
Member

@henryju henryju commented Jul 15, 2025 •
edited by atlassian bot
Loading

@hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod bot changed the title Allow to use a local Scanner Engine SCANJLIB-276 Allow to use a local Scanner Engine Jul 15, 2025
@henryju henryju force-pushed the jh/support_local_scanner_engine branch from 0cc3ab6 to 76873ea Compare July 15, 2025 15:50
@henryju henryju force-pushed the jh/support_local_scanner_engine branch from fcc44c8 to 87832e7 Compare July 16, 2025 10:17
@sonarqube-next SonarQube-Next
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
82.8% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@henryju henryju requested a review from ericg138 July 16, 2025 10:35
ericg138
ericg138 approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ericg138 ericg138 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested with scanner-cli, it works well.
Nice improvement 👍

@henryju henryju merged commit 8c7105d into master Jul 17, 2025
10 checks passed
@henryju henryju deleted the jh/support_local_scanner_engine branch July 17, 2025 07:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ericg138 ericg138 ericg138 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@henryju @ericg138