Skip to content

APPSEC-2486 S4036: Improve description #5142

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

loris-s-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

@loris-s-sonarsource loris-s-sonarsource commented Jun 23, 2025

APPSEC-2486

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
=== Message

Make sure the "PATH" used to find this command includes only what you intend.
Make sure the "PATH" variable only contains fixed, unwriteable directories.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To debate - This can also be left outside of this PR since "messages" follow a special treatment

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@loris-s-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is now on-hold because I did not find someone in time to review before PTO. I'll reopen it when I come back. Not urgent anyway

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant