Skip to content

SONARPY-2947 S6969: Update Impact to Match Type #5055

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2025

Conversation

nils-werner-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

@nils-werner-sonarsource nils-werner-sonarsource commented May 16, 2025

@nils-werner-sonarsource nils-werner-sonarsource marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2025 09:05
@nils-werner-sonarsource nils-werner-sonarsource changed the title S6969: Update Impact to Match Type SONARPY-2947 S6969: Update Impact to Match Type May 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Wohops Wohops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Wohops Wohops force-pushed the nw/s6969/python/update-impact-to-match-type branch from a33cf37 to 3c21487 Compare May 16, 2025 12:28
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@Wohops Wohops added this pull request to the merge queue May 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 750478f May 16, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@Wohops Wohops deleted the nw/s6969/python/update-impact-to-match-type branch May 16, 2025 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants