Skip to content

DART-250 Modify S4790: Update description #5007

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion rules/S4790/description.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
Cryptographic hash algorithms such as ``++MD2++``, ``++MD4++``, ``++MD5++``, ``++MD6++``, ``++HAVAL-128++``, ``++HMAC-MD5++``, ``++DSA++`` (which uses ``++SHA-1++``), ``++RIPEMD++``, ``++RIPEMD-128++``, ``++RIPEMD-160++``, ``++HMACRIPEMD160++`` and ``++SHA-1++`` are no longer considered secure, because it is possible to have ``++collisions++`` (little computational effort is enough to find two or more different inputs that produce the same hash).
Cryptographic hash algorithms such as ``++MD2++``, ``++MD4++``, ``++MD5++``, ``++MD6++``, ``++HAVAL-128++``, ``++DSA++`` (which uses ``++SHA-1++``), ``++RIPEMD++``, ``++RIPEMD-128++``, ``++RIPEMD-160++``and ``++SHA-1++`` are no longer considered secure, because it is possible to have ``++collisions++`` (little computational effort is enough to find two or more different inputs that produce the same hash).

Message authentication code (MAC) algorithms such as ``++HMAC-MD5++`` or ``++HMAC-SHA1++`` use weak hash functions as building blocks. Although they are not all proven to be weak, they are considered legacy algorithms and should be avoided.
Loading