Skip to content

SONARJAVA-5410 Modify rule S5977: Improve Rationale for Avoiding Randomness in Tests #4950

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

@tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource commented Apr 10, 2025

@hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod bot changed the title Modify rule S5977: Improve Rationale for Avoiding Randomness in Tests SONARJAVA-5470 Modify rule S5977: Improve Rationale for Avoiding Randomness in Tests Apr 10, 2025
@tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource changed the title SONARJAVA-5470 Modify rule S5977: Improve Rationale for Avoiding Randomness in Tests SONARJAVA-5410 Modify rule S5977: Improve Rationale for Avoiding Randomness in Tests Apr 10, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 55044db Apr 22, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource tomasz-tylenda-sonarsource deleted the tt/modify-S5977-randomness branch April 22, 2025 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants