Skip to content

[Gel] 6.8 & Project.primaryPartnership #3507

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Gel] 6.8 & Project.primaryPartnership #3507

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+47 −9

Conversation

CarsonF
Copy link
Member

@CarsonF CarsonF commented Jun 20, 2025

No description provided.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 20, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the GEL base image and server version from 6.4 to 6.8 in the Dockerfile and configuration. In the data model, a new computed link primaryPartnership is added to the Project type, and the departmentId rewrite logic is refactored to utilize this link for clarity and maintainability.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
Dockerfile, gel.toml Updated GEL image and server version from 6.4 to 6.8.
dbschema/project.gel, dbschema/migrations/... Added primaryPartnership link to Project; refactored departmentId rewrite logic to use this link for assignment.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6cdf774 and ae91b3b.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • dbschema/migrations/00023-m1gur4j.edgeql (1 hunks)
  • dbschema/project.gel (2 hunks)
  • gel.toml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)
  • GitHub Check: Generate (base)
  • GitHub Check: Generate (head)
  • GitHub Check: Clean
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (neo4j 5/6)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (neo4j 1/6)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (neo4j 3/6)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (neo4j 2/6)
  • GitHub Check: Unit
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (neo4j 6/6)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (neo4j 4/6)
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
gel.toml (1)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The server version update from 6.4 to 6.8 is consistent with the Dockerfile changes.

Dockerfile (1)

3-3: GEL base image version update is consistent.

The update to GEL 6.8 aligns with the server version in gel.toml.

Verify that GEL 6.8 is a stable release:

What are the release notes and changelog for GEL (Graph Engine Language) version 6.8?
dbschema/migrations/00023-m1gur4j.edgeql (2)

5-9: New primaryPartnership link implementation is correct.

The computed link properly filters for primary partnerships and limits to 1, which ensures a single result. This approach is cleaner than inline queries.

19-24: Improved clarity in departmentId assignment logic.

The refactored logic using the primaryPartnership link is more readable and maintainable. The two-step assertion approach for MultiplicationTranslationProject makes the error handling clearer.

dbschema/project.gel (2)

106-112: Good approach to work around the partial path resolution bug.

The implementation correctly avoids the backlink issue while maintaining the same functionality. The bug reference (#8633) provides helpful context for future maintainers.

33-42: To ensure we catch all instances, let’s broaden the search by removing file-type filters and looking for relevant insert patterns across the entire repo:

#!/bin/bash
# 1. Find all references to MultiplicationTranslationProject
rg "MultiplicationTranslationProject" -n -C5

# 2. Look for any insert statements creating MultiplicationTranslationProject
rg "insert.*MultiplicationTranslationProject" -n -C5

# 3. Verify partnership creation patterns
rg "insert.*Partnership" -n -C5

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CarsonF
Copy link
Member Author

CarsonF commented Jun 20, 2025

Ah with our current process, since all migration files are ran, all the migration files have to be compatible with 6.8. So really the only option here is to recreate the chain 😢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@CarsonF