Skip to content

[8.0] [MOD-8244] fix TieredFactory::EstimateInitialSize #569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

Description

Backport of #567 to 8.0.

* initailize all bf params in tiered EstimateInitialSize (metric was missing, leading to a miss computation of the components memory size estimation)

* add is_normalized to  EstimateComponentsMemory (passed to EstimatePreprocessorsContainerMemory)

* addHNSWTieredIndexTest:: testIndexesAttributes

checkes tierred index indexes attributes and componenets

* remove comment

(cherry picked from commit a586edf)
@GuyAv46 GuyAv46 marked this pull request as draft December 13, 2024 15:45
@GuyAv46 GuyAv46 marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 15:45
@GuyAv46 GuyAv46 requested a review from meiravgri December 13, 2024 15:45
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.94%. Comparing base (8764a3f) to head (bc4d1d3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 8.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              8.0     #569   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.93%   96.94%           
=======================================
  Files         100      100           
  Lines        5287     5297   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits         5125     5135   +10     
  Misses        162      162           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@meiravgri meiravgri added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 13, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Dec 13, 2024
@meiravgri meiravgri added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 13, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Dec 13, 2024
@meiravgri meiravgri added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 14, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Dec 14, 2024
@meiravgri meiravgri added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 15, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Dec 15, 2024
@GuyAv46 GuyAv46 added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into 8.0 with commit 882c06f Dec 15, 2024
14 checks passed
@GuyAv46 GuyAv46 deleted the backport-567-to-8.0 branch December 15, 2024 07:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants