Skip to content

Conversation

@joanise
Copy link
Member

@joanise joanise commented Dec 11, 2024

No description provided.

@dhdaines
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm, looks like there's a missing build dependency on ninja in there somewhere...

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Dec 11, 2024

In the error log...

Defaulting to user installation because normal site-packages is not writeable -->

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Dec 11, 2024

ERROR: setuptools==59.6.0 is used in combination with setuptools_scm>=8.x

@joanise
Copy link
Member Author

joanise commented Dec 11, 2024

I'm not sure where to force the setuptools version, declaring it in the build-system requires didn't work...

@joanise
Copy link
Member Author

joanise commented Dec 11, 2024

Alright, I have to admit I'm at a loss here. Where is this setuptools 59 coming from?

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Dec 11, 2024

YAML's Norway problem!!! https://dev.to/hugovk/the-python-3-1-problem-85g

@joanise
Copy link
Member Author

joanise commented Dec 11, 2024

Yeah, I got bit by 3.10==3.1. LOL

But I got it now. On MacOS and Windows, action/setup-python work fine even if you don't explicitly declare a Python version, but on Linux it does not. And I think the difference is from an earlier comment you made: we need a venv, and action/setup-python only actually creates it if you declare the version explicitly. Otherwise you get

Warning: The python-version input is not set. The version of Python currently in PATH will be used.

which basically means that using that action without a version is a no-op.

@joanise joanise merged commit 28524cc into main Dec 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@joanise joanise deleted the dev.ej/debug-ci branch December 11, 2024 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants