Skip to content

New Components - peerdom #16405

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

New Components - peerdom #16405

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Apr 23, 2025

Resolves #16400.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added actions to assign a member to a role, create a new role, and update an existing role within Peerdom.
    • Introduced event sources to detect and emit events when a new member is added or a new role is created.
    • Implemented comprehensive Peerdom app integration with dynamic property options and full API support for managing groups, maps, roles, and members.
  • Improvements

    • Added utility functions and constants to support configuration and data parsing.
    • Included sample event data for easier testing and validation of new member and role event sources.
  • Chores

    • Updated package version and added necessary dependencies.

@luancazarine luancazarine added the ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification label Apr 23, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 29, 2025 1:04pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 29, 2025 1:04pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 29, 2025 1:04pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This update introduces a comprehensive Peerdom integration, adding new actions, sources, utilities, and constants. It implements polling sources for detecting new roles and members, and actions for creating, updating, and assigning members to roles. The Peerdom app module now includes detailed property definitions and methods for interacting with the Peerdom API, such as listing, creating, and updating roles and members. Supporting utility and constant files are added, and each source includes a test event for validation. The package manifest is updated with a new dependency and version number.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/peerdom/actions/assign-member-to-role/assign-member-to-role.mjs
components/peerdom/actions/create-role/create-role.mjs
components/peerdom/actions/update-role/update-role.mjs
Added new action modules for assigning a member to a role, creating a role, and updating a role, each implementing required props, API calls, and error handling.
components/peerdom/common/constants.mjs Introduced constants LIMIT (100) and SHAPE_OPTIONS (["circle", "hexagon"]).
components/peerdom/common/utils.mjs Added parseObject utility for parsing JSON strings or arrays into objects.
components/peerdom/package.json Updated version to 0.1.0 and added dependency on @pipedream/platform.
components/peerdom/peerdom.app.mjs Fully implemented the Peerdom app integration with prop definitions and methods for API interaction: listing, creating, updating roles, assigning members, and paginated fetching.
components/peerdom/sources/common/base.mjs Added a base source module with polling, event emission, deduplication, and last ID tracking logic.
components/peerdom/sources/new-member/new-member.mjs
components/peerdom/sources/new-role/new-role.mjs
Added new polling source modules for "New Member Added" and "New Role Created", each extending the base and implementing event summary and function references.
components/peerdom/sources/new-member/test-event.mjs
components/peerdom/sources/new-role/test-event.mjs
Added test event fixtures for new member and new role sources, with representative data structures.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Action
    participant PeerdomApp
    participant PeerdomAPI

    User->>Action: Trigger action (e.g., create-role)
    Action->>PeerdomApp: Call method (e.g., createRole)
    PeerdomApp->>PeerdomAPI: Make HTTP request (POST/PUT)
    PeerdomAPI-->>PeerdomApp: Return response
    PeerdomApp-->>Action: Return result
    Action-->>User: Export summary and result
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Source
    participant Timer
    participant PeerdomApp
    participant PeerdomAPI
    participant DB

    Timer->>Source: Trigger poll (run)
    Source->>DB: Get lastId
    Source->>PeerdomApp: Call list function (e.g., listPeers)
    PeerdomApp->>PeerdomAPI: Fetch data
    PeerdomAPI-->>PeerdomApp: Return data
    PeerdomApp-->>Source: Return data
    Source->>Source: Emit new events, update lastId
    Source->>DB: Set lastId
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement new-role polling source (detects new roles in a circle) [#16400]
Implement new-member polling source (detects new members in a circle or assigned to a role) [#16400]
Implement create-role action (creates new role in specified circle) [#16400]
Implement assign-member-to-role action (assigns member to role) [#16400]
Implement update-role action (updates role attributes) [#16400]

Suggested labels

User submitted

Poem

A hop, a skip, a Peerdom leap,
New roles and members, no time for sleep!
Actions abound, with sources that poll,
Assign and update, we rabbits do it all.
Constants and utils, our toolkit grows,
With every commit, our garden glows!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sources
 - New Role
 - New Member

Actions
 - Create Role
 - Assign Member To Role
 - Update Role
@luancazarine luancazarine marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2025 21:08
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
components/peerdom/common/constants.mjs (1)

1-1: Consider documenting the LIMIT constant purpose

While the name suggests it's a pagination limit, a brief comment explaining its specific usage would improve maintainability.

-export const LIMIT = 100;
+// Maximum number of items to retrieve per API request
+export const LIMIT = 100;
components/peerdom/common/utils.mjs (1)

1-24: Robust object parsing utility

The parseObject utility provides comprehensive error handling for JSON parsing across different input types. This will help prevent runtime errors when dealing with potentially malformed JSON input.

One optimization suggestion:

 export const parseObject = (obj) => {
   if (!obj) return undefined;

   if (Array.isArray(obj)) {
     return obj.map((item) => {
       if (typeof item === "string") {
         try {
           return JSON.parse(item);
         } catch (e) {
           return item;
         }
       }
       return item;
     });
   }
   if (typeof obj === "string") {
     try {
       return JSON.parse(obj);
     } catch (e) {
       return obj;
     }
   }
   return obj;
 };

Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment explaining the function's purpose and usage to improve code documentation.

components/peerdom/actions/assign-member-to-role/assign-member-to-role.mjs (1)

37-42: Add date format validation for electedUntil

The electedUntil property accepts a string in YYYY-MM-DD format, but there's no validation to ensure users input a valid date.

Consider adding a pattern validation to ensure the correct format:

electedUntil: {
  type: "string",
  label: "Elected Until",
  description: "The date until which the member is elected to the role (YYYY-MM-DD)",
  optional: true,
+  pattern: "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$",
+  patternError: "Please enter a valid date in YYYY-MM-DD format",
},
components/peerdom/sources/new-role/test-event.mjs (1)

1-50: Improve test event with more realistic sample data

While the structure is comprehensive, using generic values like "string" makes the test data less realistic.

Consider using more realistic values to better simulate real-world data:

export default {
  "id": "497f6eca-6276-4993-bfeb-53cbbbba6f08",
- "name": "string",
+ "name": "Product Manager",
- "color": "string",
+ "color": "#4287f5",
  "createdAt": "2019-08-24T14:15:22Z",
  "parentId": "70850378-7d3c-4f45-91b7-942d4dfbbd43",
- "slug": "string",
+ "slug": "product-manager",
  "external": true,
  "electable": true,
- "salaryLevel": "string",
+ "salaryLevel": "Level 3",
  "mirrored": true,
- "shape": "string",
+ "shape": "circle",
  "customFields": [
    {
-     "name": "string",
+     "name": "Department",
      "values": [
-       "string"
+       "Engineering"
      ]
    }
  ],
  // ... and so on for other fields

Also, note the inconsistent date formats between createdAt (ISO 8601) and dates in the goals array (YYYY-MM-DD). Ensure this matches the expected API behavior.

components/peerdom/actions/create-role/create-role.mjs (1)

76-80: Restructure variable destructuring

The code destructures peerdom from this but then uses the imported peerdom variable instead of the local one.

Either use the local variable or remove it from the destructuring:

    try {
      const {
-       peerdom,
        customFields,
        ...data
      } = this;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d285e5f and dd5d498.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • components/peerdom/actions/assign-member-to-role/assign-member-to-role.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/actions/create-role/create-role.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/actions/update-role/update-role.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/peerdom.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-member/new-member.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-member/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-role/new-role.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-role/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/peerdom/sources/new-member/test-event.mjs (1)

1-19: Test event structure looks good

The test event contains all expected member properties including personal details, identification, and customizable fields. This structure aligns well with what would be expected from the Peerdom API for member entities.

components/peerdom/package.json (2)

3-3: Version increment appropriate for new features

The version change from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 follows semantic versioning principles for adding new functionality without breaking changes.


14-17: Dependencies correctly added

The addition of the Pipedream platform dependency is appropriate for this integration. The caret versioning (^3.0.3) allows for compatible updates.

components/peerdom/common/constants.mjs (1)

3-6: Shape options look appropriate

The shape options ("circle" and "hexagon") are clearly defined and appear to align with Peerdom's visual representation of roles.

components/peerdom/sources/new-role/new-role.mjs (1)

4-22: LGTM! The source component looks well-structured

The implementation extends the common base component appropriately and provides the necessary specialized methods for handling role events.

components/peerdom/actions/create-role/create-role.mjs (1)

25-30: Verify if parentId should use the groupId property definition

The property is named parentId but uses the groupId property definition from the Peerdom app. This might be confusing if they represent different concepts.

Please confirm if parentId and groupId are interchangeable terms in the Peerdom API or if this should be updated for consistency.

components/peerdom/peerdom.app.mjs (1)

207-214: Pagination offset starts at 1 – may skip the first record

Most REST paginations are zero-based. Setting offset = (LIMIT * page++) + 1 risks omitting the very first result. Recommend starting at 0 unless the API docs explicitly state otherwise.

-params.offset = (LIMIT * page++) + 1;
+params.offset = LIMIT * page++;

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggested a few description improvements. Moving it to QA

luancazarine and others added 4 commits April 24, 2025 15:56
Co-authored-by: Guilherme Falcão <48412907+GTFalcao@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Guilherme Falcão <48412907+GTFalcao@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Guilherme Falcão <48412907+GTFalcao@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Guilherme Falcão <48412907+GTFalcao@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/peerdom/peerdom.app.mjs (1)

151-174: API list methods don't extract data from response

The methods listGroups, listMaps, listRoles, and listPeers return the entire Axios response object instead of just the response data. This will cause the option loaders to fail, as they expect an array of items to map through.

Apply this fix to extract only the data property in the API response:

 listGroups(opts = {}) {
   return this._makeRequest({
     path: "/groups",
     ...opts,
-  });
+  }).then(({ data }) => data);
 },

Apply the same change to the other list methods: listMaps, listRoles, and listPeers.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/peerdom/peerdom.app.mjs (1)

200-224: Improve pagination logic

The paginate method has a potential issue with the hasMore logic. It currently checks data.length which would be true as long as there's at least one item returned, even if we've reached the last page.

A more reliable approach would be to check if the number of items returned is less than the requested limit:

-        hasMore = data.length;
+        hasMore = data.length === LIMIT;

This ensures pagination stops when the API returns fewer items than requested, indicating we've reached the last partial page.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd5d498 and 43e4295.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/peerdom/peerdom.app.mjs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/peerdom/sources/common/base.mjs (1)

29-29: ⚠️ Potential issue

API response handling issue - raw Axios response used incorrectly

The code assumes that fn() returns an array of items, but based on past review comments, it appears that Peerdom app methods return full Axios responses, not just response.data. This will cause the sortItems function to operate on the wrong type.

Apply this fix:

-const response = this.sortItems(await fn());
+const { data } = await fn();
+const response = this.sortItems(data);
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
components/peerdom/sources/common/base.mjs (5)

16-21: Consider adding type documentation for the ID storage

The database methods handle an ID value but don't document what type of ID is expected (string, number, etc.), which could lead to confusion for developers extending this base.

    _getLastId() {
+     // Returns the string ID of the last processed item or empty string if none exists
      return this.db.get("lastId") || "";
    },
    _setLastId(lastId) {
+     // Stores the string ID of the most recently processed item
      this.db.set("lastId", lastId);
    },

32-35: Add validation for item structure

The code assumes each item has an id property without validating it, which could lead to errors if the API response format changes.

    for (const item of response.reverse()) {
+     if (!item || typeof item.id === 'undefined') {
+       console.warn('Received item without valid id, skipping:', item);
+       continue;
+     }
      if (item.id == lastId) break;
      responseArray.push(item);
    }

22-24: Provide more meaningful default sorting implementation

The current default implementation of sortItems doesn't actually sort and might confuse developers. Consider adding documentation or implementing a more useful default.

+   /**
+    * Override this method to customize sorting of items from the API
+    * By default, returns the items in their original order
+    * @param {Array} items - The items to sort
+    * @returns {Array} The sorted items
+    */
    sortItems(items) {
      return items;
    },

10-13: Allow customization of polling interval

The source uses a default polling interval, but users might want to customize it. Consider making it configurable through props.

    timer: {
      type: "$.interface.timer",
+     label: "Polling Interval",
+     description: "How often to poll the Peerdom API for new data",
      default: {
        intervalSeconds: DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVAL,
      },
+     viewOptions: {
+       min: 60,
+       step: 60,
+     },
    },

38-40: Consider using slice for clarity

The current code modifies the array length directly to limit results, but using slice() would be more idiomatic and clear.

    if (responseArray.length) {
      if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) {
-       responseArray.length = maxResults;
+       responseArray = responseArray.slice(0, maxResults);
      }
      this._setLastId(responseArray[0].id);
    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43e4295 and 9021d2b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/peerdom/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-member/new-member.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-role/new-role.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-role/new-role.mjs
  • components/peerdom/sources/new-member/new-member.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

@luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] peerdom
2 participants