Skip to content

A theoretical synthesis introducing epistemic psychology—a framework uniting cognition, ethics, and relational science. Based on the Kahl Model of Epistemic Dissonance (KMED-R), it reconceptualises knowing as fiduciary care and introduces FBT, TACM, and the Intimate Epistemic Oath as tools for diagnosing trust and dependence.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Peter-Kahl/Reconceptualising-Knowing-as-Care-The-New-Science-of-Epistemic-Intimacy

Repository files navigation

Reconceptualising Knowing as Care

The New Science of Epistemic Intimacy

by Peter Kahl, 2025-10-15

DOI Generic badge

Two human silhouettes exchange a beam of light symbolising knowledge and trust. The warm and cool tones of their forms represent care and autonomy held in balance, visualising the concept of fiduciary intimacy—the moral act of holding another’s mind in trust.

Abstract

This concept paper synthesises a decade of research culminating in Epistemic Clientelism in Intimate Relationships (Kahl 2025a), presenting a concise overview of epistemic psychology—a new moral-cognitive framework uniting developmental, social, and clinical evidence under one relational grammar of knowing. It argues that knowledge emerges not from cognition alone but from fiduciary relations of trust, recognition, and moral reciprocity. Drawing on empirical studies across psychology and neuroscience, the paper shows that epistemic autonomy and dependence are co-regulated through patterns of recognition (ρ) and suppression (σ) established in early attachment and re-enacted in adult intimacy.

Longitudinal research (Ferreira et al., 2022; Nelson et al., 2014) links maternal frustration and sensitivity to children’s self-control and later social competence; cross-cultural work (Blair & Liu 2020; Wang & Chen 2023) demonstrates how moral grammars of recognition vary across familial and cultural systems; and neuro-affective evidence (Jakubiak & Feeney 2018) confirms that affectionate touch buffers stress and restores trust. These findings converge on a single insight: epistemic stability arises not from emotional compatibility but from ethical containment—the fiduciary regulation of asymmetry within relationships.

For psychology and psychiatry, this framework reframes trauma, dependency, and conflict as epistemic injuries: moral failures of recognition rather than affective disorders. By integrating empirical research with fiduciary ethics, epistemic psychology lays the groundwork for a science of mind rooted in care, candour, and moral reciprocity.

Keywords

epistemic psychology, fiduciary ethics, epistemic clientelism, recognition, suppression, fiduciary containment, epistemic autonomy, dissonance tolerance, attachment, trauma, relational trust, developmental psychology, cross cultural research, moral cognition

Download

Cite this work

Kahl, P. (2025). Reconceptualising Knowing as Care: The New Science of Epistemic Intimacy. Lex et Ratio Ltd. GitHub: https://github.com/Peter-Kahl/Reconceptualising-Knowing-as-Care-The-New-Science-of-Epistemic-Intimacy DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17356455

Publisher & Licence

First published in Great Britain by Lex et Ratio Ltd, 2025-10-15.

© 2025 Lex et Ratio Ltd. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0.
You may share this work for non-commercial purposes with attribution and without modification.
Licence available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

About

A theoretical synthesis introducing epistemic psychology—a framework uniting cognition, ethics, and relational science. Based on the Kahl Model of Epistemic Dissonance (KMED-R), it reconceptualises knowing as fiduciary care and introduces FBT, TACM, and the Intimate Epistemic Oath as tools for diagnosing trust and dependence.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published