-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
Hidden cut demo #1401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Hidden cut demo #1401
Conversation
# when it takes light itself 33 billion years to travel between the qubits is one of the most | ||
# philosophically loaded questions at the heart of quantum foundations. | ||
# | ||
# Despite entanglement being so philosophically provocative, it’s somewhat surprising that in fact it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# Despite entanglement being so philosophically provocative, it’s somewhat surprising that in fact it | |
# Despite entanglement being so philosophically provocative, it’s somewhat surprising that it is so |
# problem related to unentanglement, called the *hidden cut problem*. In this problem we assume that | ||
# we’re given a state consisting of many components. As we discussed, it’ll generally be the case that | ||
# most of these components are entangled with one another. But in the hidden cut problem we are | ||
# guaranteed that it’s possible to split the components up into two groups, so that between the two |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# guaranteed that it’s possible to split the components up into two groups, so that between the two | |
# guaranteed that it’s possible to split the components into two groups, so that between the two |
# , where :math:`\ket{\psi_A}` is a state of system :math:`A` and :math:`\ket{\psi_B}` is a state of | ||
# system :math:`B`. We also use the term *separable* or *factorizable* to describe an unentagled | ||
# state. We’ll usually not bother writing the tensor product sign and just write | ||
# :math:`\ket{\psi} = \ket{\psi_A}\ket{\psi_B}`. And if :math:`\ket{\psi}` isn’t unentangled we say |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"And if ..." could we drop this sentence?
# | ||
# \ket{\psi} = \ket{\psi_S}\ket{\psi_{\bar S}}, | ||
# | ||
# but we aren’t told what :math:`S` and :math:`\bar S` are. The hidden cut problem asks us, given |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we move the interjection to the end of the sentence? "The hidden cut problem asks us to determine :math:S
and :math:\bar S
, given only :math:\ket\psi
."
…en-cut Merge latest changes from upstream master
This is failing because the build environment doesn't include galois (I think). Working on it with the maintainers. |
Thank you for opening this pull request. You can find the built site at this link. Deployment Info:
Note: It may take several minutes for updates to this pull request to be reflected on the deployed site. |
Title: Hidden cut demo
Summary: Completed first draft of hidden cut demo.
Relevant references: N/A
Possible Drawbacks: N/A
Related GitHub Issues: N/A
If you are writing a demonstration, please answer these questions to facilitate the marketing process.
GOALS — Why are we working on this now?
Show a PL implementation of a recent paper (arxiv 2410.12706)
AUDIENCE — Who is this for?
Anyone interested in entanglement or hidden subgroup problems.
KEYWORDS — What words should be included in the marketing post?
Entanglement, Hidden Subgroup Problem, Hidden Cut, StateHSP
Which of the following types of documentation is most similar to your file?
(more details here)