-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
chromium: Add v4l2 m2m stateless decode configuration options #864
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
marex
wants to merge
1
commit into
OSSystems:master
Choose a base branch
from
marex:v4l2-m2m
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally, I believe that you could add the UDEV rules together with the support, so this works out of box whenever someone enables it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@otavio those udev rules should be in BSP layer (temporarily, read on ...), since they are SoC specific and this layer cannot predict what the BSP layers are doing with udev rules.
There is already an ongoing work in chromium upstream to use the proper
/dev/videoN
and/dev/mediaN
nodes , I think that is going to land in chromium 132 or 133 , at which point the udev rules won't be needed at all.So no, I don't think this layer should be adding any udev rules. The udev rules in the commit message are an example for one specific SoC.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree it usually fits in the BSP layer. Since it's harmless, adding the rules for other processors, too, could be a great idea. We can install them without any conditions. They won't have any impact if used with a different processor so that it wouldn't cause any issues.
Also, I appreciate your argument about using proper device names and how those rules may not be needed shortly. That's another good reason why this might be a better fit here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marex we are now at 132.0.6834.83, I wonder if we should land this PR now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kraj I think yes , I already rebased it last month and dropped the udev rules part .