Skip to content

Reorganize model evaluator implementations #61

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

pelesh
Copy link
Collaborator

@pelesh pelesh commented Feb 20, 2025

Reorganize model evaluator interface implementations for different families of models in a following way:

  • Pure virtual class Model::Evaluator, which defines interfaces to simulation models is in the file src/Model/Evaluator.hpp.
  • Specific implementations of Model::Evaluator class are separate for each model family:
    • PhasorDynamics::BusBase and PhasorDynamics::Component for phasor dynamics components,
    • CircuitComponent for power electronics components, and
    • ModelEvaluatorImpl for power flow components.

@pelesh pelesh added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 20, 2025
@pelesh pelesh self-assigned this Feb 20, 2025
@pelesh pelesh changed the title Reorganize model evaluator interface implementations Reorganize model evaluator implementations Feb 21, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@abirchfield abirchfield left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@pelesh pelesh merged commit 7bd2825 into develop Feb 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@pelesh pelesh deleted the model-evaluator-dev branch March 14, 2025 03:36
pelesh added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
* Replace ModelEvaluator class.

* Remove ModelEvaluatorImpl dependence for power electronics models.

* Move power flow specific files to Model/PowerFlow dir.

* Add phasor dynamics system composer.

* Add test for system composer.

* Add template for implementing synchronous machine model.

* Add testing framework for the synchronous machine model
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants