htop: 3.3.0 -> 3.4.0

[fpletz]

https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/releases/tag/3.4.0
https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/blob/3.4.0/ChangeLog

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[matthiasbeyer]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 389164

---

x86_64-linux

❌ 1 package failed to build:

• htop-vim

✅ 1 package built:

• htop

[phanirithvij]

htop-vim is broken, why the hurry

Edit: okay nevermind, that is not a plugin or so like I assumed, it is a fork. maybe it should be removed then?

[SuperSandro2000]

feel free to open a PR to mark it broken

[fpletz]

Opened a PR upstream to get rid of our patching eventually: htop-dev/htop#1637