Skip to content

Simplify future code cleaning when python versions go out of support #57

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

MusicalNinjaDad
Copy link
Owner

@MusicalNinjaDad MusicalNinjaDad commented Mar 9, 2025

fixes #34

Allows us to rely on test coverage to identify when we can remove code in place to handle older versions of python.

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Removes contextlib.suppress blocks for conditional imports.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The pull request simplifies type-checking by removing the conditional import of typing.Self and the use of contextlib.suppress. This change allows relying on test coverage to identify when code related to older Python versions can be removed.

Updated class diagram for MagicFinder

classDiagram
    class MagicFinder {
        - lineno: int
        - col_offset: int
        + __init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
        + visit(self, node: ast.AST) -> Any
        + visit_Call(self, node: ast.Call) -> Any
        + visit_Name(self, node: ast.Name) -> Any
        + visit_Attribute(self, node: ast.Attribute) -> Any
    }
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removed contextlib.suppress and conditional import of typing.Self for type-checking.
  • Removed from contextlib import suppress.
  • Removed conditional import of Self from typing using contextlib.suppress.
pytest_ipynb2/_parser.py
pytest_ipynb2/_pytester_helpers.py

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#34 Update codecov to consolidate reports from all versions tested The PR does not contain any changes related to codecov configuration or reporting.
#34 Wrap relevant code in if sys.version <
#34 Check consistent use of < and not <= etc. and Update any comments to include "sys.version <" The PR does not explicitly check or update comments related to version comparisons.

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0b2aac6) to head (7117f7f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #57   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          340       340           
  Branches        30        30           
=========================================
  Hits           340       340           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @MusicalNinjaDad - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • It's good to see the TYPE_CHECKING block being simplified by removing the suppress context manager.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟡 Review instructions: 2 issues found
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@MusicalNinjaDad MusicalNinjaDad merged commit 64a02c6 into main Mar 9, 2025
21 checks passed
@MusicalNinjaDad MusicalNinjaDad deleted the min_ver branch March 9, 2025 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Simplify future minimum version updates
1 participant