-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
Support concurrent tool call streaming with ID-based tracking #1468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
koxudaxi
wants to merge
1
commit into
10-24-add_unittest_for_mirrored_provider_clients_anthropicvertex_
Choose a base branch
from
10-28-support_concurrent_tool_call_streaming_with_id-based_tracking
base: 10-24-add_unittest_for_mirrored_provider_clients_anthropicvertex_
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason we don't have id on
ToolCallChunkorToolCallEndChunkis because (in my observation/understanding) the providers always stream tool calls one at a time, so we can put the id on theToolCallStartChunk, and then safely infer that every subsequentToolCallChunkandToolCallEndChunkis part of the tool call with the same id. This matches with my understanding of LLMs as fundamentally serial generators that produce output one-token-at-a-time (ie. when tool calls are parallel from being included in the same response, they were still generated serially).Are you seeing a provider that streams tool call chunks interleaved? If so which one?
(Aside, I'm guessing these PR descriptions are all auto-generated by Graphite? It has that smooth AI vibe that feels like its coming up with a plausible explanation based on the code change, but doesn't truly understand why the change is being made. It would be nice if the descriptions had some more of the specific human intent in them)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the question. Grok streams tool calls in parallel. We often see call_a begin, then call_b begin, then more deltas from both IDs mixed together. We rely on the id on every
ToolCallChunkandToolCallEndChunkto keep each call stitched to the right arguments. If we drop the id, the chunks from different calls become ambiguous.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://docs.x.ai/docs/guides/tools/overview#real-time-server-side-tool-calls