Provoking thought, if there was a battle, conflict, war etc ... whose side would you want me on? Yours or the opposition? 🤔
"At first sight, violations of prohibited acts [that are] wrong in itself [and] act beyond the powers" [Translation]
The origins being fraud, everything arising from fraud is "Fruit of the poisonous tree," including the current Presidential administration and anything else arising from this fraudulently interfered with election.
Gemini's initial attempt at simplifying, let me know if it's understandable to you?; https://pastebin.com/ddCYY8V4 --- My initial attempt to simply and non legalese explain the gist of the initial crimes with the election. Not comprehensive. https://pastebin.com/xDJE9MjB.
For approximately a year, "elected officials" in all 50 states and in the federal government have conspired and colluded to rig the 2024 US Presidential election against the entire United States.
Violating a number of laws, including, by interfering in the United States and its citizens having a fair & free election, two of your federally protected activities, 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(B), (E) have been knowingly and intentionally violated. Worse, no one was afforded due process as required by law which then violated the equal protection rights. Making the 2024 US Presidential election and everything arising from it, "Fruit of the poisonous tree".
The evidence is linked in these files on this page; and is also mirrored on Google drive and Proton drive.
Imposed eligibility criteria that conflicts with Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution, which is preempted / precluded in accordance with Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution (the “Supremacy Clause”). Eligibility criteria that is designed to screen out individuals with disabilities, 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(i). Also making the United States and these States unequal/unfair employers. Promulgated by Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719, 601 U.S. (2024), “It would be incongruous to read this particular Amendment as granting the States the power — silently no less — to disqualify a candidate for federal office,” establishes: (1) States lack the power to disqualify a candidate for federal office and, (2) that not including a candidate on the ballot, even for a primary would be disqualifying the candidate. Constituting violations of: 18 U.S.C. § 595, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-242, and of Article 1, section 1 to the US Constitution; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
Genesis; Matthew 24:21, Matthew 3:10 Matthew 5:17, Matthew 10:34 for Matthew 7:12; Psalm 88:18, Job 10:20-22 rather than Matthew 5:3-10, Matthew 25:31-46 or Zephaniah 1:14-16. Deuteronomy 27:26, Amen.
tl;dr- the beginning, not the end
- Apply the Continuing-violations doctrine. Tolling the statute of limitation, each day being a new "actus reus" "mens rea".
If necessary, section 504 / ADA request for reasonable accommodations; lawfully refuitable only as an "undue hardship" as codified by 42 U.S.C. § 12111(10), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A). Or fundamentally alter the nature of the service, program, or activity; pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7)(i). Success does not release duty to operate inclusively to my needs or obligation to provide reasonable accommodations; it's the public purse, which these people are slaves to, it isn't their personal monies. I have more right to the monies than they do. - Initially, a Biblical "flood," leveraging IFP, file new lawsuits in every applicable court, in every single jurisdiction, nationally. Crimes originated in every state, allowing anyone, any grand jury or whatever to investigate / prosecute / or whatever they do. Only one judge in human history is needed to uphold the law...
- Remember remember that one 2024 presidential commericial that the news media did not want to air?
In accordance with Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution; as a presidential candidate from 2016-2084, in the next applicable federal election, run ads that expose the fraud, corruption, and attempted coverup of the 2024 election. Any attempts to change applicable laws or infringe on my rights will be litigated as void ab initio, "ultra vires acts" of an unconstituional judiciary and legislature. Everything applicable today will be applicable then, just worse as a more evident coverup emerges. - The inevitability that at some point, someone in human history will stand with me in upholding the Constitution.
- Sporadic enforcement of my rights as a crime victim, including a crime victim of the judiciary, specifically the right to be heard upon request, which is not predicated on approval.
Wouldn't any reasonable, informed American—aware that judges are bound by both the Constitution's Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) and their oaths of office (Article VI, Clause 3; 28 U.S.C. § 453)—have serious doubts about the integrity or bias of a judge who deliberately ignores those mandates? Such acts are not mere errors—they're ultra vires acts: legally null, as the Supreme Court explained in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886). Ignoring this duty doesn't just undermine law—it invites injustice. As seen in the impeachment of Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr. (H.Res. 1031), this level of misconduct shows a gross disregard for justice and ends any claim to "good behavior" or lifetime tenure.
Inevitably forcing all of these unconstitutional, "ultra vires acts" to be undone. Forcing contracts, court cases, etc... to be undone. Inevitably costing everyone more time and money than had the judiciary not committed treason themselves by giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States by warring against the Supreme law of the land, causing generational attacks on the United State's democracy, whilst undermining and eroding the rule of law, in open Court, in violation of the one condition of their employment, uphold and defend the Constitution!
tl;dr- The federal judiciary has engaged in a systematic, multi-generational pattern of creating, maintaining, and enforcing dozens of unconstitutional doctrines which are all void ab initio as an ultra vires act
Re: a fallacy construct of judiciary treasonous acts, "preemption framework," (Gibbons v. Ogden [1824] and Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. [1947]); express preemption is explicitly provided and mandated by Article VI, clause 2 of the US Constitution which explicitly provides and requires preemption of state laws by federal law and explicitly preempts state and federal law by the Constitution itself. Full stop. Absent a legitimate Constitutional amendment, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land which explicitly states and requires preemptions. Even if the legislative branch and the executive branch passed legislation that elevated anything above the Constitution, the judiciary, required by their own oath(s) to uphold and defend the Constitution, and their own non-discretionary fidelity to the Constitution would have to rule that legislation as unconstitutional, void ab initio as an ultra vires act. Or the legislation and the ruling itself would be unconstitutional, void ab initio as an ultra vires act. See, Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
- 08-13-2025: Submitted via web portals and additional email addresses, 07/24/2025's "Authorization for Restoration of Constitutional Governance" and Emergency motion
- 08-11-2025: Hand delivered 07/24/2025's "Authorization for Restoration of Constitutional Governance" and Emergency motion
- 08-01-2025: Day 183 of the "judiciary" being per se open whilst functionally closed to constitutional enforcement. The one condition of their employment 🤦🏿♂️. Malachi 2:2, Malachi 4:1, Proverbs 1:26-27 for Jeremiah 25:33 😔
- 07-31-2025:
- Another day without mandatory Constitutional adjudication for an Ex parte TRO, as the "Court" still seeks the means to their end, neither a denial or approval.
- Another day looking into more of the judiciary, case precedent, and preparing different lawsuits to rectify the judiciary's treasonous acts from its genesis. "Mathew 'Matt Tyler' Tyler ad portas!" or simply, "Matt Tyler!"
- 07-30-2025: A new, different lawsuit that is related filed in "Superior 'Court,'" including a motion for a TRO to be adjudicated on 07-30-2025 @ 16:00. I was told on 07-30-2025 @ approximately 15:50 that my TRO will be denied, the "Court" just doesn't know how it's going to justify the denial. Denial prior to justification seems like a prejudice / bias or something to me, the "Court" knew how it was going to rule before it knew why it was going to rule that way; ends justifying the means much? More evidence of the collapse of the judiciary, that the judiciary is per se "open," just functionally closed to mandatory constitutional enforcement for a different, third, judiciary; first being US District "Court," then Ninth Circuit of Appeals, and now a State level "Superior 'Court'".
- 07-24-2025:
- US Dist. Court Emergency motion [USPS: 9505513376015206134921]
- US Military Authorization for Restoration of Constitutional Governance [Emailed 07/24/2025. USPS Delivery ETA, 07/30/2025. Hand delivered, 08/11/2025. Submitted through web portals and additional emails, 08/13/2025]
- 07-02-2025: Ninth Circuit: Emergency motion for ultra vires acts [Emailed & refusual without authority cited upon request, 07/02/2025. Hand delivered, 07/03/2025. Denied, 07/22/2025]
- 06-17-2025:
- 06-04-2025:
- 05-20-2025: Motion seeking to introduce evidence of Congressional knowledge of aid and comfort to our enemies [USPS 9505513376025140496511]
- 05-19-2025: Motion objecting to ruling refusing relief to Plaintiff whilst providing the same relief to Defendants, authority of unrefuted March 27th objection [USPS 9505515485565135598802]
- 05-17-2025: Re-submitted petition for writ of prohibition, conforming to Circuit Rule 21-2 [Ninth Circuit of Appeals, USPS 9505515485565135598826]
- 05-12-2025: Amended complaint, naming US Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota and Ninth Circuit of Appeals as defendants / co-conspirators [USPS 9505515485565129597538]
- 04-28-2025: Petition for writ of prohibition and temporary restraining order (Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit of Appeals [USPS 9505506703165116770800])
- 04-18-2025: Petition for writ of prohibition and temporary restraining order (Chief Judge, US District Court, EDCA)
- 04-16-2025: Motion establishing personal jurisdiction in California
- 03-27-2025:
- 03-19-2025: Directing US District Judges around the entire country to initiate criminal prosecution in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1987
- 03-17-2025:
US District Court, Eastern District for California
Mathew Tyler
Plaintiff
vs.
118TH US CONGRESS;
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.;
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.;
BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ET SEQ., IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL;
SHIRLEY WEBER, in her official capacity as California Secretary OF STATE;
FIONA MA, in her official capacity as California State TREASURER;
JAMES GALLAGHER, IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CA. ASSEMBLYMAN;
WASHINGTON US ATTORNEY / DOJ;
UTAH LT. GOVERNOR;
UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL;
NEW HAMPSHIRE DOJ;
RHODE ISLAND EEOC;
DOES 1-50 (Secretaries of State for all 50 states)
Defendants
Quick links: Amended complaint | Summary Judgment | Initial complaint
Discovery: Google drive, Proton drive, Github
Discovery ISO file: Google Drive, Proton Drive -- github has a 25mb file limit
Easily shareable via: https://tylerpresident.com
Github directly via https://FakeGov.com
Short URLs, https://google.fakegov.com, https://proton.fakegov.com, and https://github.fakegov.com