Nsight Profiling to Phoenix Benchmark Cases

[Malmahrouqi3]

User description

Description

Adding this feature to compare next to each other nsys reports of master vs. pr. I left it now for visual comparison.
To compare reports, use diff or csv-diff after exporting readable files with nsys analyze -f <format e.g. csv, txt, etc.> -o <output-file>.
Nsight Docs: https://docs.nvidia.com/nsight-systems/UserGuide/index.html#report-scripts

Variety of Reports to Display:
nvtx_sum, osrt_sum, cuda_api_sum, cuda_gpu_kern_sum, cuda_gpu_mem_time_sum, cuda_gpu_mem_size_sum, openmp_sum, opengl_khr_range_sum, opengl_khr_gpu_range_sum, vulkan_marker_sum, vulkan_gpu_marker_sum, dx11_pix_sum, dx12_gpu_marker_sum, dx12_pix_sum, wddm_queue_sum, um_sum, um_total_sum, um_cpu_page_faults_sum, openacc_sum

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Add Nsight Systems profiling to Phoenix benchmark workflow

• Generate profiling reports for master and PR branches

• Display NVTX, CUDA API, and GPU kernel summaries

• Archive profiling reports as workflow artifacts

---

Changes diagram

flowchart LR
  A["Benchmark Execution"] --> B["nsys profile"]
  B --> C["Generate .nsys-rep"]
  C --> D["Extract Stats"]
  D --> E["Display Reports"]
  E --> F["Archive Artifacts"]

Loading

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

bench.sh Enable Nsight profiling for benchmark execution                    .github/workflows/phoenix/bench.sh Wrap benchmark execution with nsys profile -o report command Apply profiling to both GPU and CPU benchmark runs +2/-2      bench.yml Add profiling report processing and archival                          .github/workflows/bench.yml Add new step to process Nsight profiling reports Extract and display NVTX, CUDA API, and GPU kernel statistics Include profiling reports in archived artifacts Compare profiling data between master and PR branches +26/-0

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Missing Error Handling The nsys profile command is added without error handling. If nsys is not available or fails, the benchmark execution will fail silently or with unclear error messages. nsys profile -o report ./mfc.sh bench --mem 12 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks else nsys profile -o report ./mfc.sh bench --mem 1 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks Incomplete Artifact Collection The workflow only archives the PR's nsys report but not the master's report, making comparison difficult. Also, the profiling step only checks for PR report existence but processes both master and PR reports. pr/report.nsys-rep master/bench-${{ matrix.device }}.* Inconsistent Logic The condition checks for pr/report.nsys-rep existence but then processes both master and pr reports without verifying master report exists, which could cause command failures. if [ -f "pr/report.nsys-rep" ]; then echo "=== Nsight Profiling Summary ===" echo "Master" (cd master && nsys stats --report nvtx_sum report.nsys-rep) echo "Pr" (cd pr && nsys stats --report nvtx_sum report.nsys-rep) echo "=== CUDA API CALLS ===" echo "Master" (cd master && nsys stats --report cuda_api_sum --format table report.nsys-rep | head -100) echo "Pr" (cd pr && nsys stats --report cuda_api_sum --format table report.nsys-rep | head -100) echo "=== GPU KERNELS ===" echo "Master" (cd master && nsys stats --report cuda_gpu_kern_sum --format table report.nsys-rep | head -100) echo "Pr" (cd pr && nsys stats --report cuda_gpu_kern_sum --format table report.nsys-rep | head -100)

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Adds Nsight Systems profiling to the Phoenix benchmarking workflows to allow side-by-side comparison of master vs. PR performance.

• Wraps both GPU and CPU benchmark invocations in nsys profile within bench.sh.
• Processes and prints key profiling metrics (NVTX, CUDA API calls, GPU kernels) in the CI via bench.yml.
• Uploads the generated report.nsys-rep as an artifact for later inspection.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
.github/workflows/phoenix/bench.sh	Prepend nsys profile to the existing benchmark commands
.github/workflows/bench.yml	Add a “Process Nsight Profiling Report” step and include the report.nsys-rep artifact

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)

.github/workflows/phoenix/bench.sh:19

• Using a fixed output name report may cause collisions or overwrite data when running multiple jobs; consider parameterizing the output file (e.g. -o "$job_slug") to improve traceability.

    nsys profile -o report ./mfc.sh bench --mem 12 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks

.github/workflows/phoenix/bench.sh:21

• Same as above: the static report filename will be reused for CPU runs—consider including $job_slug or device name in the output filename to avoid overwrites.

    nsys profile -o report ./mfc.sh bench --mem 1 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks

.github/workflows/bench.yml:97

• The workflow checks for pr/report.nsys-rep, but bench.sh emits report.nsys-rep in the workspace root (or TMPDIR). The path should match where the file is actually written or copy the report into pr/ beforehand.

          if [ -f "pr/report.nsys-rep" ]; then

.github/workflows/bench.yml:104

• [nitpick] The profiling section hardcodes just three report types—consider looping over the full set of reports listed in the PR description to reduce duplication and ensure all metrics are covered.

            echo "=== CUDA API CALLS ==="

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Validate both report files exist Check for the existence of both master and PR report files before processing. The current code only checks for the PR report but attempts to process both, which could cause errors if the master report is missing. .github/workflows/bench.yml [97-102] -if [ -f "pr/report.nsys-rep" ]; then +if [ -f "pr/report.nsys-rep" ] && [ -f "master/report.nsys-rep" ]; then echo "=== Nsight Profiling Summary ===" echo "Master" (cd master && nsys stats --report nvtx_sum report.nsys-rep) echo "Pr" (cd pr && nsys stats --report nvtx_sum report.nsys-rep) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: This suggestion correctly points out a logic flaw where only one of two required files is checked, preventing a potential workflow failure.	Medium
General	Add nsys availability check Add error handling to check if nsys command is available before execution. This prevents the script from failing silently if Nsight Systems is not installed on the system. .github/workflows/phoenix/bench.sh [19] -nsys profile -o report ./mfc.sh bench --mem 12 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks +if command -v nsys >/dev/null 2>&1; then + nsys profile -o report ./mfc.sh bench --mem 12 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks +else + echo "Warning: nsys not found, running without profiling" + ./mfc.sh bench --mem 12 -j $(nproc) -o "$job_slug.yaml" -- -c phoenix-bench $device_opts -n $n_ranks +fi Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential point of failure and proposes a robust fallback mechanism, improving the script's resilience.	Medium
Update

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.71%. Comparing base (adcc0dd) to head (d5969b3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #929   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.71%   43.71%           
=======================================
  Files          68       68           
  Lines       18360    18360           
  Branches     2292     2292           
=======================================
  Hits         8026     8026           
  Misses       8945     8945           
  Partials     1389     1389           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.