Skip to content

fix: forester Dockerfile #1881

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sergeytimoshin
Copy link
Contributor

@sergeytimoshin sergeytimoshin commented Jul 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved package installation steps for better clarity and maintainability.
    • Updated package list and cleanup process during image build.
    • Removed unused environment variables related to OpenSSL.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile for the builder stage is updated to use a multi-line apt-get install with explicit package names, replaces pkgconf with pkg-config, removes specific OpenSSL-related environment variables, and adds cleanup of the apt cache after installation. No other build or runtime commands are changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
forester/Dockerfile Refactored package installation to multi-line apt-get install, replaced pkgconf with pkg-config, removed OpenSSL env vars, and added apt cache cleanup.

Estimated code review effort

1 (~2 minutes)

Poem

In Docker’s den, a rabbit hops with glee,
Tidying lines for all to see.
Packages listed, neat and bright,
OpenSSL vars hop out of sight.
With cache swept clean, the build’s a breeze—
This Dockerfile update was done with ease! 🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
forester/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Runtime image installs libssl-dev instead of the much smaller libssl3

libssl-dev ships headers, static libs and ancillary build tooling that are unnecessary at runtime and inflate the final image.
Switch to the runtime library only:

-RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y ca-certificates libssl-dev && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
+RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends ca-certificates libssl3 && \
+    apt-get clean && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

This cuts ~35 MB from the final layer without functional change.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
forester/Dockerfile (1)

3-8: Optional: Pin package versions to make builds reproducible

Consider pinning Debian package versions (e.g., libssl-dev=3.0.9-1) or using bullseye/bookworm snapshots to guarantee byte-for-byte reproducibility across CI runs.
This is not critical but greatly improves supply-chain traceability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2371981 and 17b89e3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • forester/Dockerfile (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +3 to +8
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y \
clang \
lld \
pkg-config \
libssl-dev \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use --no-install-recommends and explicit clean-up to keep the builder layer slim

apt-get install -y without --no-install-recommends drags in a sizable set of optional packages (man-pages, locales, etc.) that are irrelevant for a builder container and slow CI/CD pulls.
A minimal install is enough for clang, lld, pkg-config, and libssl-dev.

-RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y \
+RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
     clang \
     lld \
     pkg-config \
     libssl-dev \
-    && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
+    && apt-get clean && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

(The added apt-get clean clears the local pkg cache that sometimes survives rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists.)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In forester/Dockerfile lines 3 to 8, the apt-get install command should include
the --no-install-recommends flag to avoid installing unnecessary optional
packages and reduce image size. Additionally, add an apt-get clean command after
installation to clear the local package cache, along with the existing rm -rf
/var/lib/apt/lists/* cleanup. This will keep the builder layer slim and optimize
CI/CD performance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants