Cleanup: remove or hide some InternalCoroutinesApi
#4548
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* No one is using `runSingleTaskFromCurrentSystemDispatcher`: <#3439 (comment)>, * The Ktor usage of `processNextEventInCurrentThread` got removed in 2024. * `synchronizedImpl` is mentioned in other repositories, but people use their own copies. `synchronized`, on the other hand, is actually used. * `Continuation<T>.resumeCancellableWith` doesn't seem to be used, but it was public, and there may have been accidental usages, so it goes through a deprecation cycle.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
runSingleTaskFromCurrentSystemDispatcher: Internal API to retreive a single CPU-bound task from Dispatchers.Default #3439 (comment),processNextEventInCurrentThreadgot removed in 2024.synchronizedImplis mentioned in other repositories, but people use their own copies.synchronized, on the other hand, is actually used.Continuation<T>.resumeCancellableWithdoesn't seem to be used anywhere, but it was public, and there may have been realistic accidental usages, so it goes through a deprecation cycle.