Skip to content

Fix synchronization in Subpasses sample #1341

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

JoseEmilio-ARM
Copy link
Collaborator

@JoseEmilio-ARM JoseEmilio-ARM commented Apr 25, 2025

Description

Achieve clean synchronization validation (Vulkan SDK 1.4.304.1) for the Subpasses sample

  • When issuing a barrier, save the final image layout to be used consistently in other calls.
  • Add correct subpass dependencies to avoid READ_AFTER_WRITE and WRITE_AFTER_WRITE hazards.
  • Set correct layouts at render pass creation.
  • Fix barriers in Subpasses sample.

Fixes #1197
Fixes #455
(maybe #867, #920)

General Checklist:

Please ensure the following points are checked:

  • My code follows the coding style
  • I have reviewed file licenses
  • I have commented any added functions (in line with Doxygen)
  • I have commented any code that could be hard to understand
  • My changes do not add any new compiler warnings
  • My changes do not add any new validation layer errors or warnings
  • I have used existing framework/helper functions where possible
  • My changes do not add any regressions
  • I have tested every sample to ensure everything runs correctly
  • This PR describes the scope and expected impact of the changes I am making

Note: The Samples CI runs a number of checks including:

  • I have updated the header Copyright to reflect the current year (CI build will fail if Copyright is out of date)
  • My changes build on Windows, Linux, macOS and Android. Otherwise I have documented any exceptions

If this PR contains framework changes:

  • I did a full batch run using the batch command line argument to make sure all samples still work properly

Copy link
Contributor

@asuessenbach asuessenbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great fix!
Just a couple of minor issues.

@SaschaWillems SaschaWillems self-requested a review May 3, 2025 12:56
Copy link
Collaborator

@SaschaWillems SaschaWillems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can confirm that this also fixes #920 for me 👍🏻

@marty-johnson59
Copy link
Contributor

3 approvals - merging

@marty-johnson59 marty-johnson59 merged commit fd7a1fd into KhronosGroup:main May 6, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sample subpasses throws lots of validation errors at startup Missing synchronization in "subpasses" sample
6 participants