Skip to content

Implement other_workers() and other_procs() #18

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JamesWrigley
Copy link
Collaborator

These are handy if you want to iterate over every worker/process except the current one.

These are handy if you want to iterate over every worker/process except the
current one.
@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.20%. Comparing base (09533a9) to head (5141f58).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #18      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.79%   88.20%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        2065     2069       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         1813     1825      +12     
+ Misses        252      244       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@jpsamaroo jpsamaroo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley merged commit 0cca4d3 into master Dec 12, 2024
14 checks passed
@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley deleted the other-workers branch December 12, 2024 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants