helping a bit hopefully

[leoguignard]

A small PR to maybe faster your work.

Small note:
Everywhere there is something like that:

Literal["max", "sum", None] = "max"

Why do we need to have None in the possibilities?
(before it was Literal["max", "sum"] | None = "max" which is the same.

[BadPrograms]

I think its easy to return and may be useful to people.
Do you want to make it Literal["max","sum"]|None?

[leoguignard]

It was Literal["max","sum"] | None I made it Literal["max","sum", None]. The question is can it be Literal["max","sum"]?

[BadPrograms]

No i want to have the none

[leoguignard]

What does None mean? If it means "no normalisation" then probably something less ambiguous could be better. Example: "identity" or "none" but not accepting None since it has a specific meaning.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.38%. Comparing base (1998748) to head (ecd7cea).
Report is 3 commits behind head on uted_backtrace_dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           uted_backtrace_dev      #72      +/-   ##
======================================================
- Coverage               96.39%   96.38%   -0.02%     
======================================================
  Files                       2        2              
  Lines                     305      304       -1     
  Branches                   14       15       +1     
======================================================
- Hits                      294      293       -1     
  Misses                      6        6              
  Partials                    5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.