Skip to content

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
attrs (changelog) ==25.3.0 -> ==25.4.0 age confidence

Release Notes

python-attrs/attrs (attrs)

v25.4.0

Compare Source

Backwards-incompatible Changes
  • Class-level kw_only=True behavior is now consistent with dataclasses.

    Previously, a class that sets kw_only=True makes all attributes keyword-only, including those from base classes.
    If an attribute sets kw_only=False, that setting is ignored, and it is still made keyword-only.

    Now, only the attributes defined in that class that doesn't explicitly set kw_only=False are made keyword-only.

    This shouldn't be a problem for most users, unless you have a pattern like this:

    @​attrs.define(kw_only=True)
    class Base:
        a: int
        b: int = attrs.field(default=1, kw_only=False)
    
    @​attrs.define
    class Subclass(Base):
        c: int

    Here, we have a kw_only=True attrs class (Base) with an attribute that sets kw_only=False and has a default (Base.b), and then create a subclass (Subclass) with required arguments (Subclass.c).
    Previously this would work, since it would make Base.b keyword-only, but now this fails since Base.b is positional, and we have a required positional argument (Subclass.c) following another argument with defaults.
    #​1457

Changes
  • Values passed to the __init__() method of attrs classes are now correctly passed to __attrs_pre_init__() instead of their default values (in cases where kw_only was not specified).
    #​1427

  • Added support for Python 3.14 and PEP 749.
    #​1446,
    #​1451

  • attrs.validators.deep_mapping() now allows to leave out either key_validator xor value_validator.
    #​1448

  • attrs.validators.deep_iterator() and attrs.validators.deep_mapping() now accept lists and tuples for all validators and wrap them into a attrs.validators.and_().
    #​1449

  • Added a new experimental way to inspect classes:

    attrs.inspect(cls) returns the effective class-wide parameters that were used by attrs to construct the class.

    The returned class is the same data structure that attrs uses internally to decide how to construct the final class.
    #​1454

  • Fixed annotations for attrs.field(converter=...).
    Previously, a tuple of converters was only accepted if it had exactly one element.
    #​1461

  • The performance of attrs.asdict() has been improved by 45–260%.
    #​1463

  • The performance of attrs.astuple() has been improved by 49–270%.
    #​1469

  • The type annotation for attrs.validators.or_() now allows for different types of validators.

    This was only an issue on Pyright.
    #​1474


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@forking-renovate forking-renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 13, 2025
@renovate-bot renovate-bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 13, 2025
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 13, 2025

/gcbrun

@tdbhacks tdbhacks closed this Oct 13, 2025
Copy link

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update (==25.4.0). You will get a PR once a newer version is released. To ignore this dependency forever, add it to the ignoreDeps array of your Renovate config.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/attrs-25.x branch October 13, 2025 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants