Skip to content

Update graph.memory.md #171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update graph.memory.md #171

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

danshalev7
Copy link
Contributor

@danshalev7 danshalev7 commented Jul 6, 2025

Merged/combined versions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded and restructured the documentation for the memory usage command, including enhanced descriptions, clarified syntax, detailed argument explanations, comprehensive return metrics, and new usage examples.

Merged/combined versions
@danshalev7 danshalev7 requested a review from swilly22 July 6, 2025 08:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation for the GRAPH.MEMORY command was extensively revised. Enhancements include a more detailed description, a formalized syntax section, an expanded arguments table, a comprehensive list of return fields with descriptions, and new usage examples. No code or public API changes were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
commands/graph.memory.md Expanded and restructured documentation: clarified description, syntax, arguments, return values, and added examples.

Possibly related PRs

  • Document graph.memory #148: Both PRs focus on documenting the GRAPH.MEMORY command, with the main PR expanding and restructuring the existing documentation introduced in the retrieved PR.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • gkorland

Poem

In burrows deep, with docs anew,
The memory graph now shines in view.
With tables, samples, fields explained,
All mysteries at last are tamed.
A bunny hops with joyful glee—
Clear docs for all, as they should be!
🐇📚


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
commands/graph.memory.md (3)

11-18: Avoid duplicating the syntax block and inline usage sentence

Lines 13–15 already provide a clear, formal syntax block. The extra “Usage:” sentence on line 17 repeats the same information with slightly different placeholders (<graph_id> vs <graph-name>), which may confuse readers.

Diff suggestion:

-Usage: `GRAPH.MEMORY USAGE <graph_id> [SAMPLES <count>]`

…and, if you prefer <graph-name> as the canonical placeholder, update the code block instead of keeping two variants.


21-25: Unify placeholder spelling and tighten the SAMPLES description

  1. The argument table uses SAMPLES <n> while the syntax block shows SAMPLES <count>. Pick one placeholder for consistency.
  2. Consider shortening the last sentence to avoid passive voice and make the default explicit:
-| `SAMPLES <n>`  | *(Optional)* Number of samples to take when estimating memory usage. A higher number improves accuracy but increases computation time. The samples are averaged to estimate the total size. By default, this option is set to 100 if not specified. |
+| `SAMPLES <count>` | *(Optional)* Number of samples used for estimation. More samples improve accuracy at the cost of longer execution time. If omitted, the default is **100**. |

30-43: Fix minor grammar issues and prefer consistent terminology

Line 36 and 40 use “nodes storage” / “relationships storage”, which reads awkwardly and triggered a LanguageTool warning. Use the singular noun (“node”, “edge”) or the possessive form.

-| `amortized_node_storage_sz_mb`                | integer | Amount of memory used for nodes storage (alternative naming).     |
+| `amortized_node_storage_sz_mb`                | integer | Amount of memory used for node storage (alternative naming).      |

-| `amortized_edge_storage_sz_mb`                | integer | Amount of memory used for relationships storage (alternative naming). |
+| `amortized_edge_storage_sz_mb`                | integer | Amount of memory used for edge storage (alternative naming).          |

While here, double-check whether the return type is always an integer; some internal calculations may return floats when averaged. If non-integers are possible, update the “Type” column accordingly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f751fc2 and 93ce846.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • commands/graph.memory.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
commands/graph.memory.md

[uncategorized] ~36-~36: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ... | integer | Amount of memory used for nodes storage (alternative naming). | | `...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)

@danshalev7 danshalev7 requested a review from AviAvni July 11, 2025 06:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant