-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Fix #43 Fix error when no function or struct in code #44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request addresses an error handling issue in the C analyzer by adding conditional checks before accessing dictionary keys in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
api/analyzers/c/analyzer.py:372
- Consider adding tests to verify the behavior when the 'function' key is not present in the captures dictionary.
if 'function' in captures:
api/analyzers/c/analyzer.py:381
- Consider adding tests to verify the behavior when the 'struct' key is not present in the captures dictionary.
if 'struct' in captures:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
api/analyzers/c/analyzer.py (1)
381-389
: Good consistency with struct key checks.By mirroring the same check for
'struct'
incaptures
, you maintain uniformity in error handling. Consider adding unit tests that verify behavior when no functions or structs are present.Would you like me to generate a basic test to confirm this logic when
'function'
or'struct'
is missing?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
api/analyzers/c/analyzer.py
(1 hunks)pyproject.toml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
api/analyzers/c/analyzer.py (1)
372-375
: Great defensive programming improvement!Ensuring the
'function'
key exists incaptures
before accessing it prevents potentialKeyError
exceptions and enhances robustness.pyproject.toml (1)
16-16
: Dependency version bump noted.Upgrading
flask
from^3.0.3
to^3.1.0
is a proactive move. Verify that all Flask-related integrations remain compatible and pass existing tests.
fix #43
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Dependency Updates