-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
{2023.06,zen4}[system] EasyBuild v4.9.1 #547
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
bedroge
merged 5 commits into
EESSI:2023.06-software.eessi.io
from
trz42:test_bot_on_azure
May 7, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
db81fd3
zen4-only {2023.06}[system] EasyBuild v4.9.1
truib 8cb9547
make sure lmod cfg files exists early in build environment
truib da9f206
use create_lmodsitepackage.py
truib c4cbcd8
skip CUDA install if no EasyBuild module is found
truib eeb5537
remove extra if
truib File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions
4
easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/zen4/eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.1-001-system.yml
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
easyconfigs: | ||
- EasyBuild-4.9.1.eb: | ||
options: | ||
from-pr: 20299 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ideally we use |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@trz42 Why do these need to be in place exactly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems these files are needed when
init/eessi_environment_variables
is sourced. The actual build may still work, but the issue is that the non-existence of these files createsERROR
messages in the slurm output file. Thebot/check-build.sh
thus considers the job being failed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, also have to do this here probably means that the same calls at the end of the script are just doing it too late, and it should be moved here (rather than copied)?
I'm happy to merge this as if for now, there's no negative impact when having it on both places, but it's silly, and duplicated code, so we should clean that up afterwards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to have the files created early. As it is now it creates them at the beginning if they don't exist. At the end they are created if they don't exist or if they have changed. So if we check for the change at the beginning we may remove the creation at the end.