-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
#111 enhancement : added Rate-Limiter-Flexible #124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for paisable ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR implements rate limiting functionality using the rate-limiter-flexible
library to protect API endpoints from abuse. The enhancement adds different rate limiting tiers for sensitive authentication routes versus public API routes.
- Added rate-limiter-flexible dependency and import
- Configured different rate limiters for sensitive vs public routes
- Applied rate limiting middleware to all API endpoints
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
File | Description |
---|---|
backend/server.js | Implemented rate limiting with two tiers (sensitive and public) and applied middleware to all API routes |
backend/package.json | Added rate-limiter-flexible dependency |
Files not reviewed (1)
- backend/package-lock.json: Language not supported
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
const rateLimitMiddleware = (limiter) => async (req, res, next) => { | ||
try { | ||
await limiter.consume(req.ip); | ||
next(); | ||
} catch { | ||
res.status(429).json({ message: 'Too Many Requests. Slow down!' }); | ||
} | ||
}; |
Copilot
AI
Oct 11, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using req.ip
directly for rate limiting can be bypassed by clients using proxies or load balancers. Consider implementing a more robust client identification strategy that checks for forwarded headers (X-Forwarded-For, X-Real-IP) or uses a combination of IP and user authentication for authenticated routes.
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
app.use('/api/auth', rateLimitMiddleware(sensitiveLimiter), require('./routes/authRoutes')); | ||
app.use('/api/transactions', rateLimitMiddleware(publicLimiter), require('./routes/transactionRoutes')); | ||
app.use('/api/receipts', rateLimitMiddleware(publicLimiter), require('./routes/receiptRoutes')); | ||
app.use('/api/users', rateLimitMiddleware(publicLimiter), require('./routes/userRoutes')); |
Copilot
AI
Oct 11, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
User management routes should use the sensitive limiter instead of the public limiter, as they likely contain operations like password changes, profile updates, or user data retrieval that should be more strictly rate limited.
app.use('/api/users', rateLimitMiddleware(publicLimiter), require('./routes/userRoutes')); | |
app.use('/api/users', rateLimitMiddleware(sensitiveLimiter), require('./routes/userRoutes')); |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Hey @SEEDART007, you had not been assigned this issue yet but you opened a PR. I'll give this PR the |
#111 enhancement : added Rate-Limiter-Flexible
Added Rate-Limiter-Flexible