Skip to content

When to use Babylon Native #1035

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

syntheticmagus
Copy link
Contributor

Somewhat fuzzy documentation page discussing current thinking about when Babylon Native technologies are the "right" choices for making an app. This is of course pretty speculative and will likely evolve significantly as the technologies evolve; but as a starting point, I think this is about where the conversation is right now. Let's discuss!

@syntheticmagus
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pertains to #1017, by the way.

Copy link
Contributor

@bghgary bghgary left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it overall. I think I want to see some kind of chart or a graph summarizing the pros and cons of each choice. I would expect this to evolve. For example, we make no mention of the performance issues on iOS without JIT that probably should be mentioned as a consideration.

@syntheticmagus syntheticmagus marked this pull request as ready for review March 29, 2022 21:28
@syntheticmagus syntheticmagus enabled auto-merge (squash) March 29, 2022 21:28
Copy link
Contributor

@bghgary bghgary left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, we can iterate on this more as we go

@syntheticmagus syntheticmagus merged commit 53727a6 into BabylonJS:master Mar 29, 2022
@syntheticmagus syntheticmagus deleted the whenToUseBabylonNative branch March 29, 2022 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants