-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
Write a new documentation page with branch info #1367
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Nikoleta-v3
merged 7 commits into
dev
from
update-contribution-documentation-for-new-branches
Sep 9, 2020
Merged
Write a new documentation page with branch info #1367
Nikoleta-v3
merged 7 commits into
dev
from
update-contribution-documentation-for-new-branches
Sep 9, 2020
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is related to #1352. Once this PR is merged we should: - Change github default branch to `dev` - Delete `master` - Confirm that read the docs is looking at `release` Am I missing anything? We should also remove the release process information from the wiki (assuming we're happy with what I've written here). Finally, once #1360 is done we should make sure we update the docs with the relevant information.
This is actually no longer correct since #1288
This build found a particular failing example of `TestTournament.test_seeding_equality` https://github.com/Axelrod-Python/Axelrod/pull/1368/checks?check_run_id=975415322 Upon closer investigation it looks like that was not due to seeding but due to the floating point error of some calculations made by the result set. I investigated using: ``` import axelrod as axl import numpy as np seed = 2 repetitions = 10 rng = axl.RandomGenerator(seed=seed) players = [axl.Random(rng.random()) for _ in range(8)] tournament1 = axl.Tournament( players=players, turns=10, repetitions=repetitions, seed=seed ) tournament2 = axl.Tournament( players=players, turns=10, repetitions=repetitions, seed=seed ) for _ in range(4): results1 = tournament1.play(processes=2, progress_bar=False) results2 = tournament2.play(processes=2, progress_bar=False) assert results1.wins == results2.wins assert results1.match_lengths == results2.match_lengths assert results1.scores == results2.scores assert np.allclose(results1.normalised_scores, results2.normalised_scores) assert np.allclose(results1.ranking, results2.ranking) assert results1.ranked_names == results2.ranked_names assert results1.payoffs == results2.payoffs assert results1.payoff_matrix == results2.payoff_matrix assert np.allclose(results1.payoff_stddevs, results2.payoff_stddevs) assert results1.score_diffs == results2.score_diffs assert results1.payoff_diffs_means == results2.payoff_diffs_means assert results1.cooperation == results2.cooperation assert results1.normalised_cooperation == results2.normalised_cooperation assert results1.vengeful_cooperation == results2.vengeful_cooperation assert results1.cooperating_rating == results2.cooperating_rating assert results1.good_partner_matrix == results2.good_partner_matrix assert results1.good_partner_rating == results2.good_partner_rating assert np.allclose(results1.eigenmoses_rating, results2.eigenmoses_rating) assert np.allclose(results1.eigenjesus_rating, results2.eigenjesus_rating) ``` Note I'm using `np.isclose` for some properties. In this commit: - I add the specific seed for which the error was found as a hypothesis example (`seed=2`). - Replace the `results1 == results2` check with just a check of some properties (from which the others are essentially calculated). - Added `progress_bar=False`
917eead found a failing example for the reproducible seeding (EDIT: but it's the test so please don't panic like I did! 😆), I fixed that in 3f60d5d (that commit message has more information). In that commit:
|
FYI this may cause a problem for PR #1364 |
marcharper
reviewed
Aug 12, 2020
Yeah. Hopefully easy enough to fix but I'm happy to wait for the right "gap" to get this PR in :) |
marcharper
reviewed
Aug 12, 2020
marcharper
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2020
Nikoleta-v3
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is related to #1352.
Once this PR is merged we should:
dev
master
release
Am I missing anything?
We should also remove the release process information from the wiki
(assuming we're happy with what I've written here).
Finally, once #1360 is done we should make sure we update the docs with
the relevant information.