Skip to content

Conversation

jubilarhacker
Copy link
Collaborator

@jubilarhacker jubilarhacker commented Oct 22, 2025

Overview: This PR updates the user profile form to load initial user data and integrate with the user update action, improving the overall user experience.

Changes

  • Initial user data (name, email) now loads into src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx from the session or provided props.
  • The form submission in ProfileForm.tsx has been updated to call the appropriate user update action (e.g., src/actions/user.ts).
  • Optimistic UI updates and validation messages have been added to provide immediate feedback to users.
  • Edits are confined to src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx and a single import.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Profile form pre-fills name and email, shows inline success/error toasts when saving, and disables the email field; submit reflects saving state to prevent duplicate submissions.
  • Other

    • Project analytics reporting now groups projects by type.
    • Change password and loading behavior adjusted with no visible UI changes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Walkthrough

ProfileForm was converted to an action-based client flow that accepts an optional user prop for initial values and calls updateProfile via useAction with toast feedback; some modules received client/server directives and action middleware no longer includes headers.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Profile form integration
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx
Component now accepts user?: { name: string; email: string }; form defaults from user; adds useAction with execute(data) calling updateProfile; toast.success/toast.error on handlers; email added as optional form value and rendered disabled; submit reflects isExecuting.
Client directive additions
src/components/models/user/ChangePasswordForm.tsx, src/contexts/LoadingContext.tsx
Added "use client" directive at top of both files; no other API or behavior changes.
Action/context and server directive changes
src/lib/action.ts, src/lib/session.ts
src/lib/action.ts: removed headers import and header population from action middleware context (context now contains only session). src/lib/session.ts: added "use server" directive only; exported signatures unchanged.
Analytics action update
src/actions/analytics.ts
Replaced protectedAction with authActionClient.schema(z.object({})).action(...); introduced Zod schema; changed grouping from ProjectStatus to ProjectType and renamed outputs to projectsByType with adjusted mapping.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant F as ProfileForm (client)
    participant A as useAction (client)
    participant S as updateProfile (server)
    participant T as Toast

    U->>F: Click submit
    activate F
    F->>A: execute(formData)
    activate A

    rect #f0f8ff
      Note over F,A: isExecuting = true (submit disabled)
    end

    A->>S: invoke updateProfile(ctx.session, formData)
    activate S

    alt success
        S-->>A: success response
        A-->>T: toast.success(message)
    else error
        S-->>A: error
        A-->>T: toast.error(message)
    end

    deactivate S
    deactivate A

    rect #f5fff0
      Note over F,A: isExecuting = false (submit enabled)
    end

    deactivate F
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • fehranbit

Poem

🐇 I hopped through props with nimble paws,

Prefilled names and toasts applause.
Actions whisper, buttons sleep,
Success and error take a leap.
A tiny rabbit's code that hums and hops.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ⚠️ Warning The PR title "Enhance User Profile Form with Session Data and Update Action" accurately describes the changes to src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx, which do add user prop handling, integrate the updateProfile action with useAction, and include toast-based feedback. However, the changeset contains substantial modifications beyond the ProfileForm, including conversion of multiple components to client components (ChangePasswordForm.tsx, LoadingContext.tsx), addition of "use server" directive to session.ts, removal of headers handling in action.ts, and significant refactoring of analytics.ts (changing from ProjectStatus-based to ProjectType-based grouping). The title is misleading because it suggests the scope is limited to ProfileForm enhancements when the PR actually encompasses infrastructure and architectural changes across multiple modules. The PR title should be broadened to reflect the actual scope of changes. Consider revising to something like "refactor: Update profile form and add client/server directives" or "refactor: Migrate to client components and update analytics grouping" to accurately represent the infrastructure changes alongside the ProfileForm enhancements. Alternatively, if ProfileForm is truly the focus, the other changes should be moved to a separate PR to align the title with the changeset.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/user-profile-form-enhancements

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)

20-22: Schema mismatch: Email field validated but not updated.

The profileFormSchema validates the email field and it's included in form submissions, but the updateProfile action in src/actions/user.ts only updates the name field. Since the email input is disabled (line 58), consider either:

  1. Removing email from the form schema and only validate/submit name, or
  2. Clarifying why email validation is necessary for a read-only field

The current implementation unnecessarily validates and submits email data that the action ignores.

Apply this diff to remove email from the schema if it's truly read-only:

 const profileFormSchema = z.object({
   name: z
     .string()
     .min(2, {
       message: 'Username must be at least 2 characters.'
     })
     .max(30, {
       message: 'Username must not be longer than 30 characters.'
-    }),
-  email: z.string().email({
-    message: 'Please enter a valid email address.'
-  })
+    })
 });

And update the default values:

   const form = useForm<ProfileFormValues>({
     resolver: zodResolver(profileFormSchema),
     defaultValues: {
-      name: user.name,
-      email: user.email
+      name: user.name
     }
   });

Also applies to: 40-41, 58-58

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25fcc0b and c13509a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (2)
src/hooks/use-action.ts (1)
  • useAction (6-22)
src/actions/user.ts (1)
  • updateProfile (19-29)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)

1-9: Critical: Missing 'use client' directive.

This component uses client-side hooks (useForm, useAction) and features (toast notifications) but lacks the 'use client' directive. In Next.js App Router, components are server components by default, and this will cause runtime errors.

Add the directive at the top of the file:

+'use client';
+
 import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button';
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (3)

27-27: Consider tightening the user prop type.

The current type allows both the object and its properties to be optional (user?: { name?: string; email?: string }), which is overly permissive. Consider making the properties required when the object is provided.

-export function ProfileForm({ user }: { user?: { name?: string; email?: string } }) {
+export function ProfileForm({ user }: { user?: { name: string; email: string } }) {

This provides a clearer contract: if a user object is provided, it must include both name and email properties.


32-34: Consider more comprehensive error handling.

The error handling covers basic cases but doesn't fully utilize next-safe-action's error structure (serverError, validationErrors, fetchError). While the current approach works for server errors due to handleServerError configuration, validation errors would not display field-specific messages.

     onError: (error) => {
-      const message = typeof error === 'string' ? error : error?.message ?? 'Failed to update profile';
-      toast.error(message);
+      if (error?.serverError) {
+        toast.error(error.serverError);
+      } else if (error?.validationErrors) {
+        // Handle field-specific validation errors
+        const firstError = Object.values(error.validationErrors)[0];
+        toast.error(Array.isArray(firstError) ? firstError[0] : 'Validation failed');
+      } else {
+        toast.error('Failed to update profile');
+      }
     }

11-23: Email field is validated but not used in updates.

The email field is included in the form schema with validation (lines 20-22) and submitted to the action (line 47), but the updateProfile action only updates the name field (as shown in src/actions/user.ts lines 23-24). Since the email input is disabled (line 59) and read-only, it shouldn't be validated or submitted.

Based on learnings

Remove email from the schema since it's display-only:

 const profileFormSchema = z.object({
   name: z
     .string()
     .min(2, {
       message: 'Username must be at least 2 characters.'
     })
     .max(30, {
       message: 'Username must not be longer than 30 characters.'
-    }),
-  email: z.string().email({
-    message: 'Please enter a valid email address.'
-  })
+    })
 });

And update the form to handle email separately:

const form = useForm<ProfileFormValues>({
  resolver: zodResolver(profileFormSchema),
  defaultValues: {
    name: user?.name ?? ''
  }
});

Keep the email field in JSX for display but outside the form validation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c13509a and 7fb4fa8.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/components/models/user/ChangePasswordForm.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/contexts/LoadingContext.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/action.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/session.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)
src/actions/user.ts (1)
  • updateProfile (19-29)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/models/user/ChangePasswordForm.tsx (1)

1-2: LGTM! Correct client directive for interactive form.

The 'use client' directive is necessary since this component uses React hooks (useForm, useState, useAction) and client-side features (toast notifications).

src/lib/session.ts (1)

1-2: LGTM! Correct server directive for session management.

The 'use server' directive is appropriate since this module uses server-only APIs (cookies() from next/headers) and handles sensitive session data that must never execute on the client.

src/contexts/LoadingContext.tsx (1)

1-2: LGTM! Correct client directive for React Context.

The 'use client' directive is necessary since this module uses React hooks (createContext, useContext, useState) which require client-side execution.

src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)

62-62: LGTM! Proper loading state management.

Disabling the button while the action executes prevents double submissions and provides clear feedback to users.

src/lib/action.ts (1)

27-27: No issues found. Headers removal is safe.

Verification confirms that ctx.headers is never accessed anywhere in the codebase. All actions and middleware exclusively access ctx.session and ctx.user, both of which remain available in the middleware context. The change at line 27 does not break any existing functionality.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)

55-59: Remove dead code for email error display.

Since email is not in the profileFormSchema, form.formState.errors.email will never be populated. Line 58 is unreachable dead code.

Apply this diff to remove the dead code:

       <div className='grid gap-2'>
         <Label htmlFor='email'>Email</Label>
         <Input id='email' type='email' {...form.register('email')} disabled />
-        {form.formState.errors.email && <p className='text-sm text-red-500'>{form.formState.errors.email.message}</p>}
       </div>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fb4fa8 and 23619db.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)
src/actions/user.ts (1)
  • updateProfile (19-29)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (7)

1-1: LGTM!

The 'use client' directive is correctly added for a component using client-side hooks like useForm and useAction.


9-11: LGTM!

The imports are correct and align with the patterns used in other components (SignupForm, SigninForm, Header).


13-22: LGTM!

The schema correctly validates only the name field, which aligns with the updateProfile action that only updates the name. The email field rendered in the UI is intentionally disabled and read-only.


26-26: LGTM!

The optional user prop with proper TypeScript typing addresses the validation concerns from previous reviews.


27-35: LGTM!

The useAction hook is correctly implemented with:

  • Proper import from next-safe-action/hooks
  • Robust error handling with type checks
  • User-friendly toast notifications for success and error states

44-46: LGTM!

The submit handler correctly passes form data to the execute function, which only includes the name field as expected by the updateProfile action.


60-60: LGTM!

The submit button correctly disables during action execution, preventing duplicate submissions and providing clear user feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (1)

45-47: Clean submission flow and proper button state management.

The form submission correctly calls execute(data) and the button properly reflects the executing state with disabled={isExecuting}. The form data includes the email field, but since the server action only processes the name field (and the email is disabled), this works correctly—the server's schema validation will handle the input appropriately.

Optional refinement: Since the email field is disabled and only for display, you could simplify by not registering it with the form (just render as <Input value={user?.email ?? ''} disabled />). However, the current implementation works correctly.

Also applies to: 61-61

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23619db and 020cb44.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/actions/analytics.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/actions/analytics.ts (1)
src/lib/action.ts (1)
  • authActionClient (31-63)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (2)
src/hooks/use-action.ts (1)
  • useAction (6-22)
src/actions/user.ts (1)
  • updateProfile (19-29)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint and Build
src/actions/analytics.ts

[error] 9-9: Type error: The 'this' context of type 'SafeActionClient<string, "flattened", ZodObject<{ actionName: ZodString; }, $strip>, { actionName: string; }, false, { session: IronSession; } & { ...; }, ... 4 more ..., { ...; }>' is not assignable to method's 'this' of type 'never'.

🪛 GitHub Check: lint-and-build
src/actions/analytics.ts

[warning] 9-9:
'ctx' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u

🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/models/user/ProfileForm.tsx (3)

1-1: LGTM! Correct imports and client directive.

The component correctly uses the 'use client' directive and imports useAction from next-safe-action/hooks, matching the pattern used in other forms (SignupForm, SigninForm). This addresses previous concerns about using the wrong hook.

Also applies to: 9-11


26-35: Excellent improvements! All previous issues addressed.

The implementation now correctly:

  • Makes the user prop optional with proper defaults
  • Uses useAction from next-safe-action/hooks with the correct API (execute, isExecuting)
  • Includes robust error handling that checks error types before displaying
  • Provides user feedback via toast notifications

This resolves all critical and major issues from previous reviews.


37-43: Proper form initialization with both fields.

The form correctly initializes both name and email in defaultValues, ensuring the disabled email field displays the user's email address. This addresses the previous issue where the email field would appear empty.

src/actions/analytics.ts (3)

1-5: Imports updated appropriately for the new action client pattern.

The switch from protectedAction to authActionClient and the addition of Zod are consistent with the new schema-based action pattern.


29-32: Critical: Missing ProjectType import, but suggested fix has incorrect import path.

The code uses ProjectType on line 29 without importing it. However, the suggested import path in the review comment is wrong. Based on usage throughout the codebase, ProjectType should be imported from @/generated/prisma, not @prisma/client.

Correct import:

 import { prisma } from '@/lib/prisma';
 import { authActionClient } from '@/lib/action';
 import { z } from 'zod';
+import { ProjectType } from '@/generated/prisma';

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


9-43: Clarify analytics scope and resolve unused ctx parameter.

The verification confirms the review comment is accurate:

  • ctx is accepted but never referenced in the function
  • All queries retrieve global data (no user filtering)
  • This pattern is unique; all other authActionClient actions extract and use ctx.session.user.id

However, the code design is ambiguous. The function is called globally on the home page (after authentication) while user-specific queries are handled separately, suggesting analytics may be intentionally global. Without documentation, this is unclear.

Decide: Are analytics intended to be global (all users see same stats) or user-scoped (each user sees their own stats)? Then either:

  • If global: Rename ctx to _ctx and add a comment explaining the intentional design
  • If user-scoped: Add .where({ userId: ctx.session.user.id }) filtering to the Prisma queries

@fehranbit
Copy link
Member

The inline validation messages in the profile form will definitely improve user feedback; nice touch.

@fehranbit fehranbit merged commit e027cc9 into main Oct 22, 2025
0 of 2 checks passed
@fehranbit fehranbit deleted the feat/user-profile-form-enhancements branch October 22, 2025 17:40
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
src/actions/analytics.ts (2)

18-26: Monthly aggregation is incorrect (groups by exact timestamps, not months).

groupBy({ by: ['createdAt'] }) yields near-unique buckets. Formatting to "MMM YYYY" after the fact doesn’t aggregate counts. Use DB-level month truncation or aggregate in application code.

Postgres example:

const rows = await prisma.$queryRaw<{ month: Date; count: number }[]>`
  SELECT date_trunc('month', "createdAt") AS month, count(*)::int AS count
  FROM "Project"
  /* + optional WHERE for tenant scope */
  GROUP BY 1
  ORDER BY 1 ASC
`;

const formatted = rows.map(r => ({
  name: r.month.toLocaleString('default', { month: 'short', year: 'numeric' }),
  value: r.count
}));

If portability is required, fetch createdAt and reduce in JS into month buckets.


9-26: Add user scope to all analytics queries to prevent data leakage.

The three queries read across the entire Project table without filtering by the user. Currently, any authenticated user can see analytics for all projects in the database. Your authActionClient middleware provides _ctx.user.id, which should be used to filter queries:

const userId = _ctx.user.id;
const totalProjects = await prisma.project.count({ where: { userId } });
const projectsByType = await prisma.project.groupBy({
  by: ['type'],
  where: { userId },
  _count: { type: true }
});
const projectsByCreationMonth = await prisma.project.groupBy({
  by: ['createdAt'],
  where: { userId },
  _count: { createdAt: true },
  orderBy: { createdAt: 'asc' }
});
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/actions/analytics.ts (1)

11-15: Prefer counting _all and nullish coalescing; minor perf tidy.

  • Use _count._all to represent group size robustly (avoids subtle null cases).
  • Use ?? 0 instead of || 0.
  • Optional: build a Map for O(1) lookups when mapping enum values.

Apply this diff:

   const projectsByType = await prisma.project.groupBy({
     by: ['type'],
     _count: {
-      type: true
+      _all: true
     }
   });

   const formattedProjectsByType = Object.values(ProjectType).map((type) => ({
     name: type,
-    value: projectsByType.find((item) => item.type === type)?._count.type || 0
+    value: projectsByType.find((item) => item.type === type)?._count._all ?? 0
   }));

Optional Map pattern:

const counts = new Map(projectsByType.map(({ type, _count }) => [type, _count._all]));
const formatted = Object.values(ProjectType).map(type => ({
  name: type,
  value: counts.get(type) ?? 0
}));

Also applies to: 28-31

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 020cb44 and 255b310.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/actions/analytics.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/actions/analytics.ts (1)
src/lib/action.ts (1)
  • authActionClient (31-63)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint and Build
src/actions/analytics.ts

[error] 8-8: Type error: The 'this' context of type 'SafeActionClient<...>' is not assignable to method's 'this' of type 'never'.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/actions/analytics.ts (2)

5-6: Good fix on imports.

Importing ProjectType and zod resolves earlier missing-type issues and aligns with the current action pattern.


8-8: Fix action callback params to resolve the build error.

You're destructuring non-existent keys (_parsedInput, _ctx). Per next-safe-action library, the callback receives parsedInput and ctx (among other fields). This mismatch forces a wrong overload and triggers the 'this' context ... never' error.

Apply this diff:

-export const getProjectAnalytics = authActionClient.schema(z.object({})).action(async ({ _parsedInput, _ctx }) => {
+export const getProjectAnalytics = authActionClient
+  .schema(z.object({}))
+  .action(async ({ parsedInput: _parsedInput, ctx: _ctx }) => {

Alternatively, if the params aren't needed: action(async () => { ... }) or action(async (_args) => { ... }).

After applying, verify with:

pnpm typecheck

Comment on lines +40 to 41
projectsByType: formattedProjectsByType,
projectsByCreationMonth: formattedProjectsByCreationMonth
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

API shape change: verify front-end consumers.

You now return projectsByType (formerly status-based). Ensure all callers/renderers are updated (labels, keys, legends).


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find consumers of analytics payload keys
rg -nP --type=ts --type=tsx -C2 '\bprojectsBy(Type|Status)\b'

Length of output: 27


I'll generate corrected shell scripts to search for consumers of these analytics keys without the unsupported file type flag:


---

🏁 Script executed:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Find consumers of analytics payload keys using glob patterns
rg -nP -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' 'projectsByType|projectsByStatus' -C2

Length of output: 2324


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Also check the analytics.ts file to understand the full context of the change
cat src/actions/analytics.ts | head -60

Length of output: 1201


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files importing from analytics
rg -n "from.*analytics|import.*analytics" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx'

Length of output: 191


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for any references to the analytics function/export name
rg -nP "getAnalytics|analytics" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -C1 | head -100

Length of output: 806


I found a critical mismatch. Let me verify how the data is being passed to the component:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how page.tsx is passing analytics result to ProjectStats
cat src/app/(general)/page.tsx | grep -A 20 "getProjectAnalytics\|ProjectStats"

Length of output: 166


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full page.tsx to see the component usage
cat src/app/(general)/page.tsx

Length of output: 117


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find and display the page.tsx file using fd
fd 'page.tsx' src/app --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2869


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find HomePageContainer to see how ProjectStats is used
fd 'HomePageContainer' --type f -e tsx -e ts | head -5

Length of output: 47


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find and display HomePageContainer
fd 'HomePageContainer.tsx' --exec cat {}

Length of output: 1306


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ALL usages of ProjectStats component
rg -n "ProjectStats" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

Length of output: 348


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of analyticsResult variable
rg -n "analyticsResult" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

Length of output: 113


Update ProjectStats component to match new API shape.

ProjectStats interface and implementation still reference projectsByStatus, but analytics.ts now returns projectsByType. The component is currently unused, but the prop mismatch must be fixed before it's integrated:

  • Line 8: Update interface property name
  • Line 12: Update destructured prop name
  • Line 43: Update data binding in BarChart

All three locations in src/components/models/analytics/ProjectStats.tsx need the same change: projectsByStatusprojectsByType.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/components/models/analytics/ProjectStats.tsx around lines 8, 12 and 43,
the component still uses the old prop name projectsByStatus which no longer
matches the analytics API that returns projectsByType; update the interface
property at line 8 to projectsByType, rename the destructured prop at line 12
from projectsByStatus to projectsByType, and change the data binding passed into
the BarChart at line 43 to use projectsByType instead of projectsByStatus so the
prop names align with src/actions/analytics.ts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants