Skip to content

Update 8hobbies/workflows digest to c95f86b #220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 22, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
8hobbies/workflows action digest 48a7222 -> c95f86b

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on Sunday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from xuhdev as a code owner June 22, 2025 07:23
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 22, 2025 07:23
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@

jobs:
lint:
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-lint.yml@48a7222d056fc9b96243ff58bf4933e5ed4415e0
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-lint.yml@c95f86bbd0d7f9f7fb4866b1edd66c3972219e80

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 14 days ago

To fix the issue, add a permissions block at the root of the workflow. This block will explicitly define the permissions required for the workflow. Since this is a linting workflow, it likely only needs read access to the repository contents. The permissions block should be added after the name field and before the on field.


Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/lint.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/lint.yml b/.github/workflows/lint.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/lint.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/lint.yml
@@ -15,2 +15,4 @@
 name: Lint
+permissions:
+  contents: read
 
EOF
@@ -15,2 +15,4 @@
name: Lint
permissions:
contents: read

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@

jobs:
run:
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-publish-dry-run.yml@48a7222d056fc9b96243ff58bf4933e5ed4415e0
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-publish-dry-run.yml@c95f86bbd0d7f9f7fb4866b1edd66c3972219e80

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 14 days ago

To fix the issue, add a permissions block to the root of the workflow file. This block will explicitly define the permissions required for the workflow, ensuring that the GITHUB_TOKEN has only the necessary access. Since the workflow appears to be related to publishing (dry run), it likely requires read access to repository contents and no write access.

The permissions block should be added after the name field and before the on field. The recommended permissions are:

  • contents: read for accessing repository files.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml b/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml
@@ -15,2 +15,4 @@
 name: Publish Dry Run
+permissions:
+  contents: read
 
EOF
@@ -15,2 +15,4 @@
name: Publish Dry Run
permissions:
contents: read

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@

jobs:
test:
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-runtime.yml@48a7222d056fc9b96243ff58bf4933e5ed4415e0
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-runtime.yml@c95f86bbd0d7f9f7fb4866b1edd66c3972219e80

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 14 days ago

To fix the issue, add a permissions block to the root of the workflow or the specific job. Since the workflow uses a reusable workflow, the permissions should be set at the job level to ensure the GITHUB_TOKEN has the least privileges required for the reusable workflow to function. Based on the recommendation, the minimal permissions block should include contents: read.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/runtime.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/runtime.yml b/.github/workflows/runtime.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/runtime.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/runtime.yml
@@ -24,2 +24,4 @@
   test:
+    permissions:
+      contents: read
     uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-runtime.yml@c95f86bbd0d7f9f7fb4866b1edd66c3972219e80
EOF
@@ -24,2 +24,4 @@
test:
permissions:
contents: read
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-runtime.yml@c95f86bbd0d7f9f7fb4866b1edd66c3972219e80
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@renovate renovate bot merged commit e39ffb7 into master Jun 22, 2025
13 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/all-digest branch June 22, 2025 07:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants