Skip to content

Update 8hobbies/workflows digest to 2e83292 #217

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 15, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
8hobbies/workflows action digest 3a70e39 -> 2e83292

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on Sunday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from xuhdev as a code owner June 15, 2025 05:11
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2025 05:11
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@

jobs:
lint:
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-lint.yml@3a70e39b3b81c360c7e1bd1794c9834ef5650489
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-lint.yml@2e83292d3d74551e5ea48dcd61ee7b905755c0b6

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 21 days ago

To fix the issue, add a permissions block to the root of the workflow. This block will define the least privileges required for the workflow to function correctly. Since the workflow is named "Lint" and uses a reusable workflow for linting, it likely only needs read access to the repository contents.

The permissions block should be added at the root level, ensuring it applies to all jobs in the workflow unless overridden. The recommended permissions are:

  • contents: read — Grants read-only access to the repository contents.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/lint.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/lint.yml b/.github/workflows/lint.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/lint.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/lint.yml
@@ -16,2 +16,5 @@
 
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
 on:
EOF
@@ -16,2 +16,5 @@

permissions:
contents: read

on:
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@

jobs:
run:
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-publish-dry-run.yml@3a70e39b3b81c360c7e1bd1794c9834ef5650489
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-publish-dry-run.yml@2e83292d3d74551e5ea48dcd61ee7b905755c0b6

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 21 days ago

To fix the issue, add a permissions block to the root of the workflow file. This block will explicitly define the permissions required for the workflow, ensuring that the GITHUB_TOKEN has the least privilege necessary. Based on the context, the workflow likely requires read access to repository contents and possibly write access for pull requests. If additional permissions are needed, they can be added after reviewing the requirements of the reusable workflow.


Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml b/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/publish-dry-run.yml
@@ -16,2 +16,6 @@
 
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: write
+
 on:
EOF
@@ -16,2 +16,6 @@

permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write

on:
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@

jobs:
test:
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-runtime.yml@3a70e39b3b81c360c7e1bd1794c9834ef5650489
uses: 8hobbies/workflows/.github/workflows/npm-runtime.yml@2e83292d3d74551e5ea48dcd61ee7b905755c0b6

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 21 days ago

To fix the issue, add a permissions block to the root of the workflow file. This block will explicitly define the least privileges required for the workflow to function. Since the workflow uses a reusable workflow (npm-runtime.yml), the permissions should be set to contents: read as a minimal starting point, unless additional permissions are required for the reusable workflow.

The permissions block should be added after the name field and before the on field in the workflow file.


Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/runtime.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/runtime.yml b/.github/workflows/runtime.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/runtime.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/runtime.yml
@@ -15,2 +15,4 @@
 name: Runtime
+permissions:
+  contents: read
 
EOF
@@ -15,2 +15,4 @@
name: Runtime
permissions:
contents: read

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@renovate renovate bot merged commit c3251e2 into master Jun 15, 2025
13 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/all-digest branch June 15, 2025 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants