-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
feat: application list #3160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: application list #3160
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
class ApplicationSerializer(serializers.Serializer): | ||
workspace_id = serializers.CharField(required=True, label=_('workspace id')) | ||
user_id = serializers.UUIDField(required=True, label=_("User ID")) | ||
|
||
def insert(self, instance: Dict, with_valid=True): | ||
def insert(self, instance: Dict): | ||
application_type = instance.get('type') | ||
if 'WORK_FLOW' == application_type: | ||
return self.insert_workflow(instance) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are the key points to consider when reviewing the provided code:
-
File Import Changes:
os
module has been imported at the beginning of the file.
-
Class Definitions:
- There are new classes:
ApplicationQueryRequest
,ApplicationListResponse
, andQuery
.- These are designed for serialization/ deserialization and query handling in the
list()
method.
- These are designed for serialization/ deserialization and query handling in the
- The existing methods (
to_application_model
) withinApplicationSeriaizer
have changed significantly due to these additions.
- There are new classes:
-
Method Improvements:
- Methods like
insert()
now include checks on whetherwith_valid
is set toTrue
. This might be unnecessary if such an option is always included since it's required by Django REST Framework serializers. - In the
list()
andpage()
methods, there's additional logic that checks a conditional SQL file based on environment (X-Pack Enterprise/Education).
- Methods like
-
Constants:
- No constants were introduced; only class attributes (
PROJECT_DIR
) where added.
- No constants were introduced; only class attributes (
-
Documentation and Type Annotations:
- Some comments and docstrings still use placeholders like
_DESC_(name)
, which suggest they need more detailed documentation but should work as written.
- Some comments and docstrings still use placeholders like
-
Database Interaction:
- The use of
QuerySet.filter()
without checking object permissions seems suspicious. Ensure that proper filtering conditions are applied before querying the database.
- The use of
Suggestions for Optimization / Clean-up
-
Simplify Conditional Checks:
- Refactor repeated condition checks into helper functions so that they can be reused across methods.
-
Improve Documentation:
- Provide clearer explanations and examples where necessary around the purpose of each function/method parameter and output values.
-
Consistent Error Handling:
- Standardize error handling practices, especially regarding validation errors within custom serializers.
-
Security Concerns:
- Consider security implications, such as handling input data carefully to prevent SQL injection or other similar vulnerabilities.
These areas may warrant further attention based on specific requirements context beyond what was highlighted here.
def get_page_response(): | ||
return ApplicationPageResult | ||
|
||
|
||
class ApplicationCreateAPI(APIMixin): | ||
@staticmethod | ||
def get_parameters(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's a concise review of the provided code, including potential issues and areas for optimization:
Potential Issues and Recommendations
-
Naming Conventions: Use lowercase with underscores rather than camel case for functions and variables to adhere to Python naming conventions.
class application_query_api(APIMixin): @staticmethod def get_parameters(): # ... @staticmethod def get_response(): return application_list_result @staticmethod def get_page_response(): return application_page_result
-
Class Imports: Remove unnecessary imports that can increase file size without added functionality.
import openai
: This is not used anywhere in the snippet.- Importing specific types like
APIMixin
instead of usingfrom ... import *
.
from rest_framework.response import Response from drf_spectacular.parameters import OpenApiParameter, OpenApiTypes from rest_framework.generics import ListAPIView from django.http import Http404 from .serializers.application import ApplicationCreateSerializer, ApplicationCreateRequest from .mixins.api_mixin import APIMixin from common.result import ResultBase, SuccessMessage
-
Documentation Consistency: Ensure consistent use of Markdown comments throughout the codebase for better readability.
-
Code Readability: Minor formatting improvements such as correct indentation might enhance readability.
class application_create_request(ApplicationCreateSerializer.SimulateRequest): def get_data(self): return ApplicationCreateSerializer.ApplicationResponse()
-
Variable Naming: Consider renaming
get_data()
to more descriptive names that convey its purpose.class ApplicationListResult(ResultSerializer): def get_items(self): return ApplicationListResponse(list(self.data), many=True) if self.data else []
These changes should make the codebase cleaner and potentially reduce any bugs due to incorrect handling or inefficient execution patterns caused by these minor optimizations.
def get(self, request: Request, workspace_id: str, current_page: int, page_size: int): | ||
return result.success( | ||
Query(data={'workspace_id': workspace_id, 'user_id': request.user.id}).page(current_page, page_size, | ||
request.query_params)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are no major discrepancies with this Python code that requires adjustments according to your specified criteria. The function of the class and its members seems well-defined and optimized for their intended functionality within an RESTful framework. However, here is a few minor points for review:
Minor Changes
-
Imports: Ensure you're correctly importing
ExtendSchema
. If not present, consider using Django Rest Framework's@api_view
instead, which simplifies some aspects but could be relevant depending on your project setup. -
Method Annotations: You can annotate HTTP method names (eg., @post) directly above each method definition in some frameworks like FastAPI, which avoids needing separate decorator calls. Here, everything appears correct for a standard Django Rest Framework view.
-
Error Handling: While not explicitly shown in this snippet, ensure there's proper error handling implemented for any exceptions or edge cases that might arise during data processing.
-
Security Considerations: Given access control mechanisms are integrated via decorators (
has_permissions
), make sure these work as expected across all methods, even though they don't affect logic flow in straightforward ways. -
Response Structure: In case response content needs to evolve, it’s good practice to centralize serializers into files or directories and update them uniformly rather than duplicating structure among multiple views.
Final Recommendations
The provided script looks clean and functional within typical RESTful API requirements. For further optimizations, I'd recommend leveraging Django Rest Framework extensions, reviewing existing permissions management practices to optimize security measures, and ensuring robust response serialization techniques.
If more context about how this code will specifically interact with a database or additional middleware layers would aid in suggesting tailored performance tweaks, feel free to add!
feat: application list