Skip to content

Commit 4c55c44

Browse files
author
zhangrengang
committed
update readme
1 parent a6bd522 commit 4c55c44

File tree

1 file changed

+10
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+10
-1
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 10 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ bash test_wheat.sh
2424
* [Inputs](#Inputs)
2525
* [Run SubPhaser](#Run-SubPhaser)
2626
* [Outputs](#Outputs)
27+
* [When SubPhaser do not work](#When-SubPhaser-do-not-work)
2728
* [Citation](#Citation)
2829
* [Contact](#Contact)
2930
* [Full Usage and Default Parameters](#Full-Usage-and-Default-Parameters)
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ The below is an example of output figures of wheat (ABD, 1n=3x=21):
7475
* (**E**) Insertion time of subgenome-specific LTR-RTs.
7576
* (**F**) A phylogenetic tree of 1,000 randomly subsampled LTR/Gypsy elements.
7677

77-
**Note**: On the clustering heatmap (Fig. B) and PCA plot (Fig. C), a subgenome is defined as well-phased if it has clearly distinguishable patterns of both differential k-mers and homeologous chromosomes, indicating that each subgenome shares subgenome-specific features as expected. If the subgenomes are not well-phased, the downstream analyses are meaningless and should be ignored.
78+
**Note**: On the clustering heatmap (Fig. B) and PCA plot (Fig. C), a subgenome is defined as well-phased if it has clearly distinguishable patterns of both differential k-mers and homeologous chromosomes, indicating that each subgenome shares subgenome-specific features as expected. If the subgenomes are not well-phased, the downstream analyses (may be failed) are meaningless and should be ignored.
7879

7980
### Inputs ###
8081
1. Chromosome-level genome sequences (**fasta** format), e.g. [the wheat genome](https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Assemblies) (haploid assembly, ABD, 1n=3x=21).
@@ -164,6 +165,14 @@ tmp/
164165
├── LTR.LTR_*.map # information of tip nodes on the above tree
165166
.....
166167
```
168+
169+
### When SubPhaser do not work ###
170+
1. It is expected not to work with autopolyploids, as autopolyploids is expected not to produce subgenome-specific TEs.
171+
2. It may not work when there are too much natural combinations or artifact switch errors between subgenomes.
172+
3. It does not work when there are no or too less TEs expanding in the independently evolving period of the progenitors or these TEs have been eliminated. This maybe true for some plants and fungi with low TE content.
173+
4. It may not work for mesopolyploids, and not work for paleopolyploids, which subgenome-specific TEs have been eliminated. However, the genetic boundary is not very clear.
174+
5. Other unknown cases can be reported to me.
175+
167176
### Citation ###
168177
If you use `SubPhaser`, please cite:
169178
> Jia K, Wang Z, Wang L et. al. SubPhaser: A robust allopolyploid subgenome phasing method based on subgenome-specific k-mers [J]. *New Phytologist*, 2022, in press [DOI:10.1111/nph.18173](https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18173)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)