Simply use #[component] instead of #[function_component]

[tdooms]

This is probably a very small nitpick but I don't understand why we need the #[function_component] macro to be prefixed with "function_".

I understand the original decision for the name as this was still when struct components were quite prevalent and a clear distinction was warranted. However, with the current state of function components, I feel it would be more elegant to simply write #[component].

There is little room for confusion as the syntax between the two components is already very different. Conversely, I think it could even be clearer to beginners who wonder why the "function" part is repeated when you're already writing a function.

Furthermore, I've seen multiple other frameworks that also use only #[component].

[ranile]

I agree with this. Would you like to PR a change that does the rename and deprecates the previous name? I would like to still keep a re-export to avoid a breaking change

[tdooms]

I just did, I changed all occurrences that I was able to find in the documentation, examples, and code. I also kept the original name as a re-export as you asked. link to pr

However, this is my first PR so I hope I did everything right.