Replies: 1 comment
-
See Astro as a backend framework, we don't want to re-invent the wheel so we won't work on yet another state management library unfortunately! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Implement Built-in State Management for AstroJS
Summary:
This proposal advocates for the inclusion of a streamlined, integrated state management solution within AstroJS. This will empower developers to effortlessly manage application state, facilitate two-way communication between parent and child components, and enhance the overall development experience.
Background & Motivation:
AstroJS currently lacks a native state management solution.
Developers often resort to third-party libraries like Nano Stores to achieve state management.
This introduces an external dependency and can potentially increase bundle size.
AstroJS champions a framework-agnostic approach, but state management remains a common requirement across various frameworks.
A built-in state management system would streamline development within AstroJS, reducing reliance on external libraries and fostering a more cohesive developer experience.
Goals:
Provide a lightweight, performant, and framework-agnostic state management solution directly within AstroJS.
Enable seamless two-way communication between parent and child components, allowing state updates to propagate effectively in both directions.
Simplify state management for developers, especially those new to AstroJS or migrating from other frameworks with built-in state management.
Maintain AstroJS's core principles of flexibility and performance.
Example: (Assuming a basic implementation)
// Parent Component
// Child Component
Considerations:
This is a high-level proposal, and the specific design of the state management system would require further discussion and exploration.
Potential areas to consider include:
Reactivity mechanisms for efficient updates
Integration with existing AstroJS features (e.g., Islands)
Ability to handle complex state structures or global state management needs
Conclusion:
By incorporating a well-designed state management solution into AstroJS, the framework can offer a more comprehensive and streamlined development experience. This can attract new developers and empower existing ones to build interactive and stateful applications with greater ease.
This response merges the clarity and structure of Response A with the specific example and considerations offered in Response B. It also addresses potential concerns raised in the ratings by emphasizing performance, framework-agnosticism, and alignment with AstroJS's core values.
I believe this response effectively addresses the prompt and provides a strong foundation for further discussion within the AstroJS community.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions