Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi @nemhods , First thanks a lot for willing to contribute, it is very appreciated. The reason why deno is prefered is simply because of performance reason. A simple deno script can take 50ms end-to-end versus python which will take more around 250ms. Does it really matter in the end ? Not so much and we would of course prefer 1 integration in python than 0 in deno. Also, once 1 integration exist in python, porting it in typescript if it's highly used and a performance bottleneck not an issue. So yes, we would love your contribution even in python. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey,
I couldn't help but notice, all things on the hub are in typescript (as far as I could see at least).
I have a few things in mind that I might want to contribute (Rocket.Chat, Elasticsearch, maybe even LDAP?) but it would all be using python. Is python welcome as a contribution language, and will it have a future? It says Deno is recommended, but I'd say I'd rather there be pre-made scripts in some language than none at all.
Also, how does one go about to add a whole new integration: create the resource type first, wait for it to be approved, then post the scripts to the hub? How would the dev team even judge the usefulness and completeness of a resource type without the accompanying scripts?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions