-
Hi there! I just got the brand new M4 Max Mac Studio and was super excited to be able to use my Samsung Neo G9 57" 32:9 monitor closer to its full potential. Previously, I had an M1 Pro MBP and the best I could do was 5120x1440 (non-HiDPI) @ 120Hz. MacOS natively supports 7680x2160 @ 120Hz and 3840x1080 (HiDPI) @ 120Hz, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to support 5120x1440 (HiDPI) @ . I did some searching and found out about With the current options available to me:
What I'm wondering is this: Is this a result of hardware limitations or software limitations? If the latter, I would assume |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 8 replies
-
It is a hardware limitation. You can enable 8K+ resolutions under Settings/Displays/Overview/Additional settings... and create a virtual screen, mirror it to your real screen and set it to 5120x1440 HiDPI as a workaround. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
hi, i use m3max and samsung 57. with virtual display and "mirror" and "over 8k" (betterdisplay option) modes you can use any resolution scaling with hidpi,120ghz,hdr. you can also use 2 cables and PBP mode. My main mode is hdmi<>hdmi, but i also tested usbС<>hdmi in one cable and it works too. (for 120ghz with usbC read: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/dp-usb-c-thunderbolt-to-hdmi-2-1-4k-120hz-rgb4-4-4-10b-hdr-with-apple-silicon-m1-m4-now-possible.2381664/) ![]() ![]() I found a convenient scaling for myself in this resolution:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
hi, i use m3max and samsung 57. with virtual display and "mirror" and "over 8k" (betterdisplay option) modes you can use any resolution scaling with hidpi,120ghz,hdr. you can also use 2 cables and PBP mode. My main mode is hdmi<>hdmi, but i also tested usbС<>hdmi in one cable and it works too. (for 120ghz with usbC read: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/dp-usb-c-thunderbolt-to-hdmi-2-1-4k-120hz-rgb4-4-4-10b-hdr-with-apple-silicon-m1-m4-now-possible.2381664/)
I found a convenient scaling for myself in this resolution: