HTML date input and SC 3.3.2 #4206
Replies: 3 comments
-
for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
as for the implied question why the wording was changed, the old WCAG 2.0 wording seems to hint at |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm trying to understand the wording of SC 3.3.2 in WCAG 2.1 & 2.2:
This changed from WCAG 2.0 (emphasis added):
Would normal usage of
input[type="date"]
fail 3.3.2 if the date format is not also included in the label or somewhere else that's persistently shown?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions