Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Hi @ankycampy, Could you share the following?
Some ideas:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi All, Vector is deployed in a single dedicated server with 16vCPU and 32GB RAM.
Aws_s3 source with sqs is configured as a source, this is a very huge volume source.
Sink is Splunk HEC.
When started the vector with required config, i see that vector cpu utilization seems stuck at 30% only and not increasing. i believe vector is pulling limited logs per batch and hence less logs are sent to destination as compared to available at source.
As of now, i have reverted back the config to original architecture which does not involve vector. we wanted to see how vector performs in default configuration, now we want to tune it and then retest.
we have single s3 bucket which receives a huge volume of data, how to maximize vector resource utilization to achieve its full potential. We are not sure if we can have multiple s3 buckets.
we can vertically scale vector as per requirement. but first we are looking for config examples which can help tuning vector to run it with all available server resources, should we focus on increasing source specific throttle config, an example or reference will be useful if someone has worked on similar setup.
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions