Replies: 3 comments
-
Why not just do this:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Well there could be other filters. The idea is to do this incrementally. So in the end, I am retaining simply: if apply_filter1:
vdf = vdf[vdf['a'] >= 0]
if apply_filter2:
vdf = vdf[vdf['a'] <= 2] Thanks for your proposal! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
yeah, performance shouldn't matter, because we don't eagery compute the filter. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I would like to filter a dataframe, depending conditions defined elsewhere in the code.
It seems I can do so by using filters defined as a string.
I have however not found this documented. Please, is this acceptable or should this be avoided?
Working example:
Thanks for your feedback!
Bests
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions