Replies: 1 comment
-
I've not got any personal experience with issuehunt, but I believe the general premise is to allow anyone to contribute bounties for tasks that are important to them, and anyone can collect that bounty by resolving it. It's a tool to both prioritise development important to enterprise users, and to solicit more input from the open source community. As for the actual governance of who decides that a bounty has been earned, I have no idea. Will read up when I get a chance! If my company adopts sphinx-needs as an internal tool I may be able to solicit bounties for issues which affect us, for example |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First draft to collect ideas.
Text and list will get updated during discussion.
Goal: Get things done for Sphinx-Needs by allowing support via different ways (time, money, skill, ...)
Getting PRs from the community and issues solved is awesome.
But there are user of Sphinx-Needs, who don't have the needed skills or time or motivation to solve an issue.
So lets use this discussion to see if there is a need for different kinds of supporting use.
List of "support" services:
Events:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions