-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Description
I defined seconds * 10^-5
and it serializes weird.
I expected perhaps "s/100000"
or "s.10^-5"
. The UCUMFormat'ers all produce "s.0"
.
Formatter | output string |
---|---|
UCUM Case Insensitive | "s.0" |
UCUM Case Sensitive | "s.0" |
UCUM Print | "s.0" |
EBNFUnitFormat | "s·10^-5" |
Here is a test to recreate the potential issue.
package systems.uom.ucum.format;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import tech.units.indriya.function.MultiplyConverter;
import javax.measure.Unit;
import javax.measure.format.UnitFormat;
import javax.measure.quantity.Time;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static systems.uom.ucum.UCUM.SECOND;
import static systems.uom.ucum.format.UCUMFormat.Variant.CASE_SENSITIVE;
public class UnitFormatWithNegativeExponentFactor {
protected static final UnitFormat FORMAT_CS = UCUMFormat.getInstance(CASE_SENSITIVE);
/**
* s * 10^5 => pass
*/
@Test
public void testExponentFactor10e5() {
MultiplyConverter e5 = MultiplyConverter.ofExponent(10, 5);
Unit<Time> se5 = SECOND.transform(e5);
assertEquals("s.100000", FORMAT_CS.format(se5));
}
/**
* s * (1 / 10^5) => pass
*/
@Test
public void testRationalFactor10e5Reciprocal() {
MultiplyConverter e5ReciprocalRational = MultiplyConverter.ofRational(1, 100000);
Unit<Time> s_e5 = SECOND.transform(e5ReciprocalRational);
assertEquals("s/100000", FORMAT_CS.format(s_e5));
}
/**
* s * 10^-5 => fail
* <p>
* Expected :s/100000
* Actual :s.0
*/
@Test
public void testExponentFactor10e5Reciprocal() {
MultiplyConverter e5ReciprocalPow10 = MultiplyConverter.ofExponent(10, -5);
Unit<Time> se5 = SECOND.transform(e5ReciprocalPow10);
assertEquals("s/100000", FORMAT_CS.format(se5));
}
}
I'm not overly familiar with this ecosystem, but it strikes me that tech.units.indriya.AbstractUnit.prefix()
always results in a PowerOfIntConverter via MultiplyConverter.ofPrefix()
(same as MultiplyConverter.ofExponent()
). Which by luck is how I constructed the unit I was using.
Should MultiplyConverter.ofPrefix()
sometimes result in a RationalConverter instead? Or should additional logic be included in UCUMConverterFormatter.formatConverter()
? It seems it already handles this scenario for RationalConverter.
If we can find a good path to resolve this, I'm happy to draft a PR. Cheers!